Effects of postoperative rehabilitation on functional exercise capacity, dyspnea, and quality of life after pulmonary endarterectomy: a systematic review

Postoperative rehabilitation after pulmonary endarterectomy

Article information

J Yeungnam Med Sci. 2025;42.32

Publication date (electronic) : 2025 April 10

doi : https://doi.org/10.12701/jyms.2025.42.32

Department of Continuity of Care and Integration, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy

Corresponding author: Massimiliano Polastri, PT, MSc Department of Continuity of Care and Integration, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via G. Massarenti 9, Bologna 40138, Italy Tel: +39-51-214-4980 • Fax: +39-51-214-3485 • E-mail: gbptap1@gmail.com

Received 2025 February 28; Revised 2025 March 31; Accepted 2025 April 4.

Abstract

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) leads to increased vascular resistance and progressive right heart failure resulting from occlusion of proximal pulmonary arteries by fibrotic intravascular material. The elective surgical treatment for CTEPH is pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA), which involves removal of the chronic thromboembolic material from the entire pulmonary arterial tree. This study aimed to verify the effects of acute and subacute postoperative rehabilitation on the functional exercise capacity, dyspnea, and quality of life (QoL) of patients with CTEPH undergoing PEA. This was a systematic review of seven primary databases. At the end of the selection process, five documents were included in the final analysis. Three of these five studies were conducted in Italy, one in Korea, and one in Germany. Of 204 patients, 95 (47%) were male. This systematic review determined that in patients with CTEPH pre-PEA, the 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) ranged between 284.7 m and 371.95 m and that at 6 to 12 weeks post-PEA, after having attended postoperative rehabilitation, the 6MWD was 434.1 m to 483.6 m. The Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire was administered to evaluate QoL 3 and 22 weeks after PEA. At 22 weeks, the SF-36 physical component summary score improved from baseline (42.78±18.37 points) by 19.55±19.42 points (p=0.001), and the SF-36 mental component summary score improved from baseline (55.76±23.94 points) by 6.36±20.44 points (p=0.137).

Keywords: Exercise; Pulmonary hypertension; Physiotherapy; Respiratory therapy; 6-minute walk test

Introduction

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) leads to increased vascular resistance and progressive right heart failure resulting from occlusion of the proximal pulmonary arteries by fibrotic intravascular material in combination with secondary microvasculopathy of the vessels [1]. Patients with CTEPH are typically prone to exercise limitations and, in severe cases, are movement-restricted if not confined to bed rest because of reduced O₂ delivery to the periphery and impaired skeletal muscle diffusion capacity (i.e., the capacity to transport atmospheric oxygen into the mitochondria is limited) [2]. Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) is an elective procedure for the surgical treatment of CTEPH [3-14] and consists of the removal of chronic thromboembolic material from the entire pulmonary arterial tree via a median sternotomy utilizing cardiopulmonary bypass [8,15]. Successful surgery relies on three main principles: (1) the surgery must be performed on both lungs; (2) cardiopulmonary bypass with periods of circulatory arrest is essential to achieve adequate exposure in the face of copious bronchial blood flow; and (3) true endarterectomy in the plane of the media must be accomplished [8].

The first attempt to surgically remove clots from the pulmonary artery was described by Trendelenburg at the beginning of the 20th century [16]. Since the early 1970s to late 1980s [17-22], PEA has been increasingly performed in the Netherlands, Sweden, France, Japan, Mexico, Finland, South Africa, Germany, Austria, Italy, Chile, Spain, Israel, Denmark, the United Kingdom, Poland, China, Turkey, Belgium, the Czech Republic, Brazil, Canada, Taiwan, Korea, Russia, India, and Bulgaria [15,23-49]. The University of California, San Diego, serves as the international reference center [6,50,51] and has performed 5,000 procedures as of July 2024.

The in-hospital mortality rate of PEA is estimated to be <5%, with survival rates ≥90% at 3 years. To increase and preserve these figures, centers performing PEA should meet an annual volume of at least 50 procedures [1], with 33 cases to 40 cases per year defining high-volume centers [52]. Indeed, the 30-day mortality rates decrease as the number of procedures increases [53]. A carefully monitored postoperative rehabilitative intervention after PEA should be considered a standard of care according to the European Respiratory Society statement on CTEPH, and it is a viable option even in inoperable cases [1].

Data from the United States Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension Registry, encompassing 750 patients, contribute to profiling the characteristics of patients undergoing PEA [54]. Five hundred and sixty-six out of 750 patients underwent PEA; the median age was 57 years (range, 44–67 years), 52.7% were male, and the body mass index (BMI) was 30.4 kg/m² (range, 26.1–36.3 kg/m²) [54]. Similarly, data from an international registry that included one Canadian and 26 European centers described the characteristics of 386 patients who underwent surgery; the median age was 60 years (range, 18–64 years), and 54.1% were males [55].

Although PEA is increasingly performed worldwide, information on the effects of acute and subacute postoperative rehabilitation in patients with CTEPH after PEA is scarce, and there is currently no special focus on the role of rehabilitation during postoperative recovery.

This study aimed to investigate the effects of acute and subacute postoperative rehabilitation on functional exercise capacity, dyspnea, and quality of life (QoL) in patients with CTEPH who underwent PEA.

Study design

This study was a systematic review of seven primary databases (Table 1). The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were used to design this review [56]. The databases were searched for articles published from database inception until February 2025. Two keyword entries, “pulmonary endarterectomy” and “rehabilitation,” were combined into a search string using the Boolean operator AND (Table 1). Filters for document types were applied, excluding letters to the editor, conference proceedings, and reviews. No filters were applied for age, sex, or publication date.

Table 1.

Search strings, keywords used, and searched fields for seven primary databases

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

To be included, citations had to be published in English, French, Spanish, or Italian describing postoperative rehabilitation in adult patients who underwent PEA. Citations not describing postoperative rehabilitation and those involving patients aged <18 years were excluded.

After duplicates were removed, the remaining documents were screened for eligibility based on their abstracts. For articles with abstracts that met the inclusion criteria, full texts were screened for suitability, and confirmed citations were considered eligible for the final analysis. The search was completed on February 28, 2025.

Results

The initial search returned 152 articles, and 101 citations were screened after removing duplicates. At the end of the selection process, five documents were included in the final analysis (Fig. 1). One of the five articles was a prospective interventional study [57], one was a case report [58], and three were retrospective observational studies [59-61] (Table 2). Three of these five studies were conducted in Italy, one in Korea, and one in Germany. Of 204 patients, 95 (47%) were male (Table 2). In one study [61], the New York Heart Association (NYHA) class was determined pre- and post-PEA, and patients gained significant improvements postoperatively, with the majority (90%) dropping from NYHA class IV preoperatively to class II postoperatively. In another study [59], NYHA class was determined at the time rehabilitation commenced, with most patients (>70%) in classes III and IV.

Fig. 1.

PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) flow chart.

Table 2.

Characteristics of the included studies with patients undergoing pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA)

Functional exercise capacity

The 6-minute walk test (6MWT) is used to measure response to medical interventions in patients with moderate-to-severe heart or lung disease, including pulmonary hypertension [62,63]. Although optimal reference values are not precisely defined in healthy adults, studies have determined that in adult men and women, the median 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) is 580 m and 500 m, respectively [62,64]. Similarly, the 6MWD was estimated to be 630 m among a population of 51 healthy individuals aged 50 to 85 years [62,65].

Data from the United States Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension Registry indicate that the median 6MWD was 334 m (range, 235–406 m) before PEA [54]. Similarly, data from a European-Canadian Registry indicate that the median 6MWD was 341 m (range, 20–700 m) [55].

In a large cohort study of 499 patients (54.9% males) aged 57.5 years (range, 11–84 years) evaluating long-term outcomes after PEA, 257 patients could walk 346.1±127.3 m at the 6MWT preoperatively. At the 15-year follow-up, the 6MWD was 422.9±122.0 m in 173 patients [53].

It is estimated that 6MWD at 1 year after PEA can increase from 69%±4% to 87%±3%, correlating with the clinical and hemodynamic severity of CTEPH [66].

The present review determined that in patients with CTEPH pre-PEA, the 6MWD ranged between 284.7 m and 371.95 m (Table 3), as extracted from two studies involving 77 patients with a mean age of 57.6±12.4 years and 53.4±15.3 years, respectively (Table 3) [57,61]. To the same extent, it was extrapolated that at 6 to 12 weeks post-PEA, after having attended postoperative rehabilitation, patients could walk between 434.1 m and 483.6 m in the 6MWT. In comparison, at 22 weeks, patients could walk 493.4 m (Table 3) [57,61].

Table 3.

Outcomes related to postoperative rehabilitation after pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA)

After a 3-week postoperative rehabilitation program in one study, most patients achieved a minimal clinically important difference in the 6MWT (Table 3) [59].

Although the 6MWT requires patients to walk unassisted and bear the effort of walking along an established path, the daily walk (DW) distance during rehabilitation or normal activities does not require patients to perform a specific motor task. Therefore, it has been assumed that the DW distance can be used to determine the motor abilities of patients who underwent PEA, particularly during acute postoperative recovery, when they may not be able to perform the 6MWT. In one study, it was found that after an extended stay of 9.5 days (range, 3–20 days), patients could achieve a DW distance of 750 m (range, 60–2,300 m) and that men, patients aged <60 years, and those with a BMI ≥25 kg/m² performed better than women, patients aged >60 years, and those with a BMI ≤25 kg/m², as shown in Table 3 [60]. Based on the available data, the 6MWD and DW pre- and/or post-PEA trends are shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Six-minute walk distance and daily walk before and after pulmonary endarterectomy. ICU, intensive care unit; PEA, pulmonary endarterectomy; DW, daily walk; 6MWD, 6-minute walk distance.

Postoperative rehabilitation also expedited and facilitated the functional recovery of patients with complications necessitating extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support after PEA (Table 3) [58]. The use of ECMO as rescue therapy for the management of perioperative complications during PEA (e.g., reperfusion pulmonary edema, endobronchial hemorrhage, and right ventricular failure) not amenable to conventional cardiorespiratory support or preoperatively as a bridge to PEA has been demonstrated to be an effective therapeutic option, with 5-year survival rate post-ECMO of >70% [67,68]. However, the rehabilitation of patients undergoing ECMO has become a standard of care, as highlighted in the literature [69,70], even during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic [71].

Dyspnea and perceived exertion after pulmonary endarterectomy

Exertional dyspnea or dyspnea at rest is a characteristic symptom in patients arriving for PEA preoperatively [2,8,54]. The patients included in the present review experienced relief from dyspnea postoperatively. Indeed, in two studies [57,61], the scores on both the Borg and visual analog scales improved after patients attended a postoperative rehabilitation program (Table 3). However, alternative instruments to quantify dyspnea in patients before and after PEA could be explored to verify whether, for example, the Modified Borg Scale [72] and Barthel Index Dyspnea (BI-d) [73] can provide more detailed information. Indeed, Modified Borg Scale scores 0–10, with lower scores indicating less dyspnea, can simplify the scoring, particularly during postoperative acute rehabilitation. In addition, BI-d provides more complex and detailed information on the intensity of symptoms during the execution of daily activities, and for this specific reason, could contribute to defining patients’ deterioration or progress with more precision. The BI-d score ranges from 0 (absence of dyspnea) to 100 (maximal dyspnea perceived), and it has been calculated that the minimal clinically important difference ranges from 6.5 to 9 points in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) without chronic respiratory failure and from 7.5 to 12 points in patients with COPD and chronic respiratory failure [74]. As dyspnea is a primary symptom in patients with CTEPH, similar to those with COPD, the administration of BI-d before and after PEA can help identify the aspects of daily activities that benefit most from surgery and postoperative rehabilitation.

Quality of life

In the present review, QoL was evaluated using Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) at 3 weeks and 22 weeks post-PEA, and improvements were observed in both the physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores, as shown in Table 3. The SF-36 questionnaire comprises 36 questions organized into eight domains aggregated into two summary scores, the PCS and MCS. The SF-36 scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better QoL [75]. Unlike the present review, where SF-36 was administered at 3 weeks and 22 weeks post-PEA, a study among 136 patients with a mean age of 49.4±12.7 years (42.6% women) who had undergone PEA reported SF-36 data available both preoperatively and at 1 year post-PEA [76]. In that study, significant differences were observed between SF-36 pre-PEA and at 1-year follow-up in both the PCS (34.33±7.30 vs. 42.59±9.42 points; p<0.001) and MCS (37.05±7.89 vs. 47.65±7.93; p<0.001). In the study by Kamenskaya et al. [76], QoL was better and sustained over a longer follow-up period than that shown in the SF-36 data in Table 3. However, no information was provided on rehabilitation, leaving room for further consideration, including to what extent QoL improvements are related to surgery alone or postoperative rehabilitation. This may require further analysis. The investigation encountered difficulties in delineating the specific domains of QoL that rehabilitation influenced during the postoperative phase. Effects on the mental components of QoL were less pronounced than those on motor function, complicating the derivation of conclusive insights into the overall impact of rehabilitation on QoL. Indeed, QoL in patients who underwent PEA is a matter of increasing interest, and recently, a single-center study provided further insights into this specific aspect [77]. In that research, 49 patients returned the RAND-36 questionnaire, which included the same items and eight domains as those in the SF-36 [78]; in addition, 47 participants returned the Cambridge Pulmonary Hypertension Outcome Review (CAMPHOR), a patient-reported outcome measure of QoL explicitly designed for patients with pulmonary hypertension [79]. The latter contains 65 items in three domains: symptoms, activity, and QoL, with higher scores indicating worse QoL and greater functional limitations [79,80]. For RAND-36, the mean time from PEA to evaluation was 8.5 years (range, 1–24 years), and the most affected domains were physical role and physical functioning [77]. For CAMPHOR, the mean time from PEA to evaluation was 5.9 years (range, 0.4–20 years), and the mean scores across domains were 4, 2.5, and 4 points for activity, QoL, and symptoms, respectively [77].

Rehabilitation before and after pulmonary endarterectomy

Given the increasing number of procedures performed, defining and quantifying the rehabilitative outcomes after PEA is of increasing interest. Patients who undergo PEA echo the cardiac surgery pathway and share preoperative functional limitations.

Postoperative rehabilitation after PEA is characterized by various aspects, depending on the care setting (Fig. 3). However, preoperative rehabilitation has not yet been explored in this patient population. In this regard, one crucial aspect that could be of interest for preoperative rehabilitation is the management of exertional dyspnea; therefore, there is potential for implementing respiratory techniques that enhance patient comfort (e.g., relaxed breathing and breathing control). Simultaneously, educational programs that concentrate on customizing motor activities to individual needs can assist patients in becoming accustomed to movement and in preparing better for surgery. Patients who have undergone PEA are still prone to postoperative peripheral oxygen desaturation and dyspnea on exertion, particularly during the initial recovery phase, when active mobilization and becoming accustomed to exercise are the primary goals. Muscle deconditioning is often observed in patients after PEA because of prolonged periods of inactivity or reduced mobility due to preoperative exertional dyspnea and peripheral oxygen desaturation.

Fig. 3.

Postoperative rehabilitation is divided into phases depending on the care setting. 1: Acute, typically intensive care unit (ICU). 2: Subacute, sub-intensive environment and cardiac ward. 3: Post-acute, rehabilitation facility. 4: Long-term, home or outpatient programs. ADL, activities of daily living.

Rehabilitation in the intensive care setting

Immediately after surgery, physiotherapy plays a crucial role in airway clearance in the intensive care unit (ICU) because of impaired mucus transport during mechanical ventilation and other pulmonary complications such as atelectasis, dysventilation phenomena, and impaired respiratory drive [81-84]. Manual techniques, including patient positioning, breathing control, chest wall vibration, postural drainage, and assisted coughing, can significantly contribute to expediting patient progression to intermediate care settings [85]. During the ICU stay, deep breathing exercises without mechanical devices are undoubtedly a viable option for reducing atelectasis, increasing lung volume, facilitating mucus clearance, and improving gas exchange. These exercises should be proposed to patients regardless of their layout because of the ease and flexibility of their execution [86]. During supervised deep breathing exercises, patients are instructed to inhale slowly and as deeply as possible, hold their breath, and exhale the air slowly through their mouths. A treatment session consists of five breaths to 15 breaths repeated up to three times, avoiding hyperinflation and fatigue [86]. Breathing exercises can also be performed using mechanical devices that provide positive expiratory pressure [86-88]. The use of mechanical (positive expiratory pressure devices) or manual techniques primarily depends on patient cooperation and sedation status in the ICU. Briefly, the initial postoperative recovery phase is dedicated to managing respiratory function and preventing or treating pulmonary complications; passive and active range of motion exercises are initiated concurrently [89].

Rehabilitation in the sub-intensive setting

As soon as patients are cleared to a sub-intensive setting, respiratory therapy still plays a crucial role, and incorporating respiratory techniques into motor activities contributes to maintaining and ensuring adequate oxygenation during this early recovery phase. In this review, two studies [60,61] described respiratory physiotherapy during the in-hospital subacute phase, focusing on lung ventilation and airway clearance. Additionally, it should be highlighted that during the first 3 weeks after PEA, the primary rehabilitative goal is motor reconditioning in the absence of complications. Physical reconditioning should be implemented, considering that cardiac and pulmonary remodeling can be achieved several weeks postoperatively. Therefore, fatigue and dyspnea on exertion may occur, and oxygen supplementation may be necessary during motor rehabilitation activities following surgery. During this phase, strengthening exercises targeting large muscle groups, such as the quadriceps, gluteus, and triceps, can be performed with or without assistive devices such as cycle ergometers [60]. Walking training and facilitating the resumption of daily activities are essential components of in-hospital postoperative rehabilitation to allow patients to become accustomed to motor exercises. At this stage, the frequency, intensity, and duration of rehabilitative sessions are approximately 1 hour twice per day, 5 to 6 days per week, for 2 to 3 weeks, depending on the length of hospital stay [57,60].

Long-term postoperative rehabilitation

At an advanced stage, post-acute functional recovery is achieved through rehabilitative programs (lasting 3 weeks, 5–6 days per week) that incorporate aerobic exercise training to achieve maximal functional exercise capacity [57,59,61].

However, the rehabilitative journey of patients who have undergone PEA could be further personalized in cases of inoperable or postoperative residual CTEPH, as in the presence of peripherally located thrombi (associated with lower improvements in pulmonary hemodynamics) [90]. There have been cases of inoperable patients or those in whom PEA is ineffective, resulting in residual CTEPH. Under these circumstances, rehabilitation can contribute to the preservation of residual motor function. Indeed, in a study involving eight patients (aged 64±12 years) with inoperable or residual CTEPH, a 12-week home-based pulmonary rehabilitation program improved functional exercise capacity and QoL [90]. The program included one in-hospital class per week in which patients performed 40 to 60 minutes of supervised exercises, including endurance training on a cycle ergometer. The home-based sessions consisted of lower and upper limb strength training, respiratory exercises, and walking. At the completion of rehabilitation, patients experienced significant improvements, walking an average of 415.4±57.0 m at 12 weeks compared to 382.1±45.4 m at baseline (p<0.01) in the 6MWT. In addition, significant changes were detected in QoL with the activity domain of the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire score improving from 65.0±10.6 points at baseline to 52.9±14.2 points at 12 weeks (p<0.05) [90].

In another study, 35 patients (aged 61±15 years) with inoperable or residual CTEPH participated in a program consisting of a 3-week inpatient rehabilitation period followed by 12 weeks of home-based exercise [91]. The program included interval bicycle ergometer training, strengthening exercises, walking, and respiratory training, 5 days per week. The 6MWD improved by 61±54 m at 3 weeks (p<0.001) and by 71±70 m at 15 weeks (p=0.001) relative to the baseline distance (408±108 m) [91].

Safety

Exercise in patients with pulmonary hypertension is not without risks, and close monitoring must be guaranteed during rehabilitative sessions. In a study of 183 patients with different types of pulmonary hypertension (idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension, heritable pulmonary arterial hypertension, associated pulmonary arterial hypertension, and CTEPH), 13.6% experienced adverse events, consisting of presyncope, syncope, supraventricular tachycardia, and hemoptysis, during a 3-week in-hospital training program [92]. In another study of 35 patients, of whom 33 had inoperable CTEPH and two had residual CTEPH after PEA, during a 3-week rehabilitation program, five patients had an adverse event, with two cases related to exercise (syncope and herpes zoster) [91].

Limitations

The present study has some limitations. First, a small number of citations and patients were included; however, it is worth noting that the number of procedures has increased recently, rising from 1,580 cases as of 2002 to 5,000 as of July 2024 at the highest-performing center in San Diego, California [51,93]. These figures are consistent with the assumption that PEA is a relatively new procedure; therefore, the available data on rehabilitation indicate that high-volume centers are still few [52]. Second, the inability to extrapolate comprehensive patient demographic information from the analyzed studies presents challenges in generalizing the results to a broader population. This limitation indicates that the conclusions drawn may not be universally applicable to all patients who undergo PEA. Third, in the present study, functional exercise capacity was measured using the 6MWT; therefore, comparisons with other methods (e.g., the 1-minute sit-to-stand test) were not possible.

Finally, the extent to which specific domains of QoL rehabilitation influence postoperative outcomes could be a matter of debate because the effects on mental components did not echo motor function, the former being less robust. Therefore, from this study, it is challenging to extrapolate absolute hypotheses, although, from the data analyzed here, QoL improved over time postoperatively.

Conclusion

This study confirms that postoperative rehabilitation after PEA can be divided into several phases. Acute in-hospital rehabilitation is crucial to help patients become accustomed to movement and prepare for more intense activities. The 6MWD and DW are the most effective instruments for detecting motor changes during recovery, with the latter being calculated even in the early postoperative phase. It was also found that patients could walk a median daily distance of 750 m and climb at least one flight of stairs at hospital discharge. After attending a 3- to 12-week subacute postoperative rehabilitation program, patients could walk a 6MWD that ranged from 434.1 to 483.6 m.

Contextually, significant progress in QoL can be expected in both physical and mental domains, although the physical components are most likely to display marked results linked to rehabilitation.

Another crucial aspect of this review is that exercise must be closely monitored, as adverse events (in particular, syncope and presyncope) related to motor activity are possible. However, fatal consequences were not reported.

This systematic review underscores the need for further research involving larger sample sizes and diverse methodologies to enhance our understanding of the effects of postoperative rehabilitation on functional exercise capacity, dyspnea, and QoL in patients who underwent PEA.

Notes

Conflicts of interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Funding

None.

References

1. Delcroix M, Torbicki A, Gopalan D, Sitbon O, Klok FA, Lang I, et al. ERS statement on chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J 2021;57:2002828. 10.1183/13993003.02828-2020. 33334946.

2. Howden EJ, Ruiz-Carmona S, Claeys M, De Bosscher R, Willems R, Meyns B, et al. Oxygen pathway limitations in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Circulation 2021;143:2061–73. 10.1161/circulationaha.120.052899. 33853383.

3. Moser KM, Daily PO, Peterson K, Dembitsky W, Vapnek JM, Shure D, et al. Thromboendarterectomy for chronic, major-vessel thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: immediate and long-term results in 42 patients. Ann Intern Med 1987;107:560–5. 10.7326/0003-4819-107-4-560. 3631790.

4. Moser KM, Auger WR, Fedullo PF, Jamieson SW. Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: clinical picture and surgical treatment. Eur Respir J 1992;5:334–42. 10.1183/09031936.93.05030334. 1572447.

5. Jamieson SW, Auger WR, Fedullo PF, Channick RN, Kriett JM, Tarazi RY, et al. Experience and results with 150 pulmonary thromboendarterectomy operations over a 29-month period. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;106:116–27. 10.1016/s0022-5223(19)33748-1. 8320990.

6. Hartz RS. Pulmonary thromboendarterectomy for pulmonary hypertension. Curr Opin Cardiol 1993;8:802–7. 10.1097/00001573-199309000-00013. 10146401.

7. Mayer E, Dahm M, Hake U, Schmid FX, Pitton M, Kupferwasser I, et al. Mid-term results of pulmonary thromboendarterectomy for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;61:1788–92. 10.1016/0003-4975(96)00169-5. 8651785.

8. Jamieson SW. Pulmonary thromboendarterectomy. Heart 1998;79:118–20. 10.1136/hrt.79.2.118. 9538301.

9. Archibald CJ, Auger WR, Fedullo PF. Outcome after pulmonary thromboendarterectomy. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;11:164–71. 10.1016/s1043-0679(99)70009-2. 10378860.

10. Madani MM, Jamieson SW. Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med 2000;2:141–8. 10.1007/s11936-000-0007-0. 11096519.

11. Thistlethwaite PA, Madani M, Jamieson SW. Pulmonary thromboendarterectomy surgery. Cardiol Clin 2004;22:467–78. 10.1016/j.ccl.2004.04.009. 15302365.

12. D’Armini AM, Zanotti G, Viganò M. Pulmonary endarterectomy: the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Ital Heart J 2005;6:861–8. 16270481.

13. Madani MM. Pulmonary endarterectomy for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: state-of-the-art 2020. Pulm Circ 2021;11:20458940211007372. 10.1177/20458940211007372. 34104418.

14. Jenkins DP, Martinez G, Salaunkey K, Reddy SA, Pepke-Zaba J. Perioperative management in pulmonary endarterectomy. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2023;44:851–65. 10.1055/s-0043-1770123. 37487525.

15. Dunning J, McNeil K. Pulmonary thromboendarterectomy for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Thorax 1999;54:755–6. 10.1136/thx.54.9.755. 10456965.

16. Jamieson S, Pomar J. Surgical treatment for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: an historical perspective. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2022;11:98–105. 10.21037/acs-2021-pte-15. 35433366.

17. Moser KM, Braunwald NS. Successful surgical intervention in severe chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Chest 1973;64:29–35. 10.1378/chest.64.1.29. 4717457.

18. Utley JR, Spragg RG, Long WB 3rd, Moser KM. Pulmonary endarterectomy for chronic thromboembolic obstruction: recent surgical experience. Surgery 1982;92:1096–102. 7147187.

19. Moser KM, Spragg RG, Utley J, Daily PO. Chronic thrombotic obstruction of major pulmonary arteries: results of thromboendarterectomy in 15 patients. Ann Intern Med 1983;99:299–304. 10.7326/0003-4819-99-3-299. 6614679.

20. Lang SJ, Mulder DG. Thromboembolic obstruction of the pulmonary artery treated by endarterectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 1986;41:557–9. 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)63041-x. 3707250.

21. Levinson RM, Shure D, Moser KM. Reperfusion pulmonary edema after pulmonary artery thromboendarterectomy. Am Rev Respir Dis 1986;134:1241–5. 3789523.

22. Daily PO, Dembitzsky WP, Iversen S, Moser KM, Auger W. Current early results of pulmonary thromboendarterectomy for chronic pulmonary embolism. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1990;4:117–23. 10.1016/1010-7940(90)90181-x. 2334550.

23. Drost H, Kolff J, Huysmans HA, Buis B. Successful thromboendarterectomy in a patient with chronic lung embolism. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1983;127:2091–4. 6646272.

24. Bengtsson L, Henze A, Holmgren A, Björk VO. Thrombendarterectomy in chronic pulmonary embolism: reports of 3 cases. Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1986;20:67–70. 3704599.

25. Jault F, Cabrol C, Gandjbakhch I, Pavie A, Bors V, Vaissier E, et al. Results of thrombo-endarterectomy of chronic pulmonary embolism. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss 1990;83:205–8. 2106855.

26. Nakagawa Y, Masuda M, Shiihara H, Tsuruta Y, Abe H, Miura M, et al. Surgical results of pulmonary thromboendarterectomy for chronic pulmonary thromboembolism. Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi 1991;39:192–9. 2033336.

27. Barragán R, Palomar A, Gómez A, Martínez ML, Salas J, Cueto G, et al. Pulmonary thromboendarterectomy as a treatment of chronic pulmonary arterial hypertension secondary to unresolved pulmonary thromboembolism: a preliminary report. Arch Inst Cardiol Mex 1991;61:413–23. 1772313.

28. Luosto R, Mattila T, Kukkonen S, Pohjola-Sintonen S. Pulmonary thromboendarterectomy in the treatment of pulmonary hypertension. Duodecim 1992;108:1403–7. 1366159.

29. Richards GA, Girdwood RW. Functional improvement following thrombo-endarterectomy for chronic pulmonary thrombo-embolic disease: a case report. S Afr J Surg 1992;30:50–1. 1519126.

30. Iversen S, Hake U, Gerharz E, Kutschera Y, Wittlich N, Jakob H, et al. Pulmonary thrombendarterectomy in thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: the indications and early results. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1992;117:1087–92. 1623833.

31. Klepetko W, Moritz A, Burghuber OC, Ziesche R, Kneussl M, Lang I, et al. Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension and its treatment with pulmonary thrombendarterectomy. Wien Klin Wochenschr 1995;107:396–402. 7638970.

32. Alfieri O, Torracca L, Pardini A, Ferrari G, Santoli C, Viganò M, et al. Pulmonary thromboendarterectomy in the surgical treatment of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: first Italian experience. Cardiologia 1995;40(12 Suppl 1):561–5.

33. Zalaquett R, Becker P, Irarrázaval MJ, Morán S, Maturana G, Arriagada D, et al. Pulmonary thromboendarterectomy: a case of surgical treatment of chronic pulmonary thromboembolism under circulatory arrest with deep hypothermia. Rev Med Chil 1996;124:847–54. 9138374.

34. Carrascal Y, Rodríguez E, Maroto L, Rufilanchas JJ, Cortina J, Molina L, et al. Thromboendarterectomy as a treatment for chronic pulmonary hypertension. Rev Esp Cardiol 1996;49:869–75. 9026837.

35. Milgalter E, Kramer MR, Lafair J, Bar Ziv Y, Varshtendig A, Matot I, et al. Pulmonary thrombo-endarterectomy. Harefuah 1996;131:465–536. 465-8, 536. 9043153.

36. Allermand H, Kristensen BO, Christiansen CL, Egeblad MR. Thromboendarterectomy of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Ugeskr Laeger 1997;159:6079–81. 9381581.

37. Biederman A, Dyk W, Torbicki A, Wilczyński J, Gawałkiewicz T, Hajduk B, et al. Pulmonary thrombendarterectomy in treatment of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Pol Arch Med Wewn 2000;104:747–52. 11434086.

38. Wu Q, Wu Y, Wang D. Pulmonary thromboendarterectomy in the management of chronic pulmonary thromboembolic hypertension. Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi 2001;24:273–5. 11802974.

39. Küçükaksu S, Ulaş MM, Tarcan O, Cağli K, Bardakçi H, Tüfekçioğlu O, et al. Surgery approach to a young patient with chronic pulmonary embolism, pulmonary thromboendarterectomy: a case report. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg 2004;4:96–8. 15033629.

40. Puis L, Vandezande E, Vercaemst L, Janssens P, Taverniers Y, Foulon M, et al. Pulmonary thromboendarterectomy for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Perfusion 2005;20:101–8. 10.1191/0267659105pf791oa. 15918447.

41. Lindner J, Jansa P, Kunstyr J, Mayer E, Blaha J, Palecek T, et al. Implementation of a new programme for the surgical treatment of CTEPH in the Czech Republic: pulmonary endarterectomy. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;54:528–31. 10.1055/s-2006-924465. 17151967.

42. Thomson B, Tsui SS, Dunning J, Goodwin A, Vuylsteke A, Latimer R, et al. Pulmonary endarterectomy is possible and effective without the use of complete circulatory arrest: the UK experience in over 150 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008;33:157–63. 10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.11.009. 18077177.

43. Gomes WJ, Imaeda CJ, Perfeito JA, Sarmento PA, Souza RC, Forte V. Repeat pulmonary thromboendarterectomy after recurrence of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. J Bras Pneumol 2009;35:91–4. 19219336.

44. de Perrot M, McRae K, Shargall Y, Pletsch L, Tan K, Slinger P, et al. Pulmonary endarterectomy for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: the Toronto experience. Can J Cardiol 2011;27:692–7. 10.1016/j.cjca.2011.09.009. 22018451.

45. Oh SJ, Bok JS, Hwang HY, Kim KH, Kim KB, Ahn H. Clinical outcomes of thromboendarterectomy for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: 12-year experience. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013;46:41–8. 10.5090/kjtcs.2013.46.1.41. 23423163.

46. Luo WC, Huang SC, Lin YH, Lai HS, Kuo SW, Pan SC, et al. Pulmonary endarterectomy for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: a single-center experience in Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc 2015;114:1197–203. 10.1016/j.jfma.2014.08.009. 25267092.

47. Cherniavskiĭ MA, Edemskiĭ AG, Kudaev IA, Cherniavskiĭ AM. Surgical treatment of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Angiol Sosud Khir 2018;24:109–13. 30321154.

48. Shetty V, Punnen J, Natarajan P, Orathi S, Khan B, Shetty D. Experience with pulmonary endarterectomy: lessons learned across 17 years. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2022;30:532–9. 10.1177/02184923211044035. 34494902.

49. Ignatov G, Ng CY, Tan Z, Velchev V, Kurkchieva T, Whitbread JC, et al. Early experience with pulmonary endarterectomy in Bulgaria-case series. Ann Transl Med 2023;11:216. 10.21037/atm-22-4370. 37007538.

50. Iversen S. Thoracic research scholarship 1988: pulmonary thromboendarterectomy for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension at the University of California, San Diego. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990;38:86–90. 10.1055/s-2007-1014000. 2349556.

51. Jamieson SW, Kapelanski DP, Sakakibara N, Manecke GR, Thistlethwaite PA, Kerr KM, et al. Pulmonary endarterectomy: experience and lessons learned in 1,500 cases. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;76:1457–64. 14602267.

52. Heuts S, Kawczynski MJ, Leus A, Godinas L, Belge C, van Empel V, et al. The volume-outcome relationship for pulmonary endarterectomy in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J 2025;65:2401865. 10.1183/13993003.01865-2024. 39572220.

53. Miyahara S, Schröder TA, Wilkens H, Karliova I, Langer F, Kunihara T, et al. Long-term outcomes after pulmonary endarterectomy in 499 patients over a 20-year period. Ann Thorac Surg 2021;111:1585–92. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.06.122. 32949609.

54. Kerr KM, Elliott CG, Chin K, Benza RL, Channick RN, Davis RD, et al. Results from the United States chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension registry: enrollment characteristics and 1-year follow-up. Chest 2021;160:1822–31. 34090871.

55. Mayer E, Jenkins D, Lindner J, D'Armini A, Kloek J, Meyns B, et al. Surgical management and outcome of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: results from an international prospective registry. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011;141:702–10. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.11.024. 21335128.

56. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Int J Surg 2021;88:105906. 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906. 33789826.

57. Nagel C, Nasereddin M, Benjamin N, Egenlauf B, Harutyunova S, Eichstaedt CA, et al. Supervised exercise training in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension as early follow-up treatment after pulmonary endarterectomy: a prospective cohort study. Respiration 2020;99:577–88. 10.1159/000508754. 32726793.

58. Seong GM, Hong SB, Huh JW, Lim CM, Koh Y, Lee JW, et al. Central extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and early rehabilitation for persistent severe pulmonary hypertension following pulmonary endarterectomy. Acute Crit Care 2019;34:158–64. 10.4266/acc.2016.01032. 31723922.

59. La Rovere MT, Pinna GD, Pin M, Bruschi C, Callegari G, Zanotti E, et al. Exercise training after pulmonary endarterectomy for patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Respiration 2019;97:234–41. 10.1159/000492754. 30293071.

60. Polastri M, Bacchi-Reggiani ML, Cefarelli M, Jafrancesco G, Martìn-Suàrez S. The distance walked daily as a post-operative measure after pulmonary endarterectomy. Int J Ther Rehabil 2013;20:195–9. 10.12968/ijtr.2013.20.4.195.

61. Petrucci L, Carlisi E, Ricotti S, Klersy C, D’Armini AM, Viganò M, et al. Pulmonary endarterectomy in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: short-term functional assessment in a longitudinal study. Eura Medicophys 2007;43:147–53. 17460603.

62. ATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratories. ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;166:111–7. 10.1164/ajrccm.166.1.at1102. 12091180.

63. Brooks D, Solway S, Gibbons WJ. ATS statement on six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003;167:1287. 10.1164/ajrccm.167.9.950.

64. Enright PL, Sherrill DL. Reference equations for the six-minute walk in healthy adults. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;158(5 Pt 1):1384–7. 10.1164/ajrccm.158.5.9710086. 9817683.

65. Troosters T, Gosselink R, Decramer M. Six minute walking distance in healthy elderly subjects. Eur Respir J 1999;14:270–4. 10.1034/j.1399-3003.1999.14b06.x. 10515400.

66. Reesink HJ, van der Plas MN, Verhey NE, van Steenwijk RP, Kloek JJ, Bresser P. Six-minute walk distance as parameter of functional outcome after pulmonary endarterectomy for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;133:510–6. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.10.020. 17258590.

67. Chia AXF, Valchanov K, Ng C, Tsui S, Taghavi J, Vuylsteke A, et al. Perioperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for pulmonary endarterectomy: a 17-year experience from the UK national cohort. J Heart Lung Transplant 2024;43:241–50. 10.1016/j.healun.2023.09.008. 37730188.

68. Sugiyama K, Suzuki S, Fujiyoshi T, Koizumi N, Sato M, Ogino H. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after pulmonary endarterectomy for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. J Card Surg 2019;34:428–34. 10.1111/jocs.14052. 31017313.

69. Polastri M, Eden A, Swol J. Rehabilitation for adult patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Perfusion 2024;39(1 Suppl):115S–126S. 10.1177/02676591231226289. 38651577.

70. Polastri M, Eden A, Loforte A, Dell’Amore A, Antonini MV, Riera J, et al. Physiotherapy for patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support: how, when, and who: an international EuroELSO survey. Perfusion 2024;39:162–73. 10.1177/02676591221133657. 36239077.

71. Polastri M, Swol J, Loforte A, Dell’Amore A. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and rehabilitation in patients with COVID-19: a scoping review. Artif Organs 2022;46:30–9. 10.1111/aor.14110. 34778984.

72. Burdon JG, Juniper EF, Killian KJ, Hargreave FE, Campbell EJ. The perception of breathlessness in asthma. Am Rev Respir Dis 1982;126:825–8. 7149447.

73. Vitacca M, Paneroni M, Baiardi P, De Carolis V, Zampogna E, Belli S, et al. Development of a Barthel Index based on dyspnea for patients with respiratory diseases. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2016;11:1199–206. 10.2147/copd.s104376. 27354778.

74. Vitacca M, Malovini A, Balbi B, Aliani M, Cirio S, Spanevello A, et al. Minimal clinically important difference in Barthel index dyspnea in patients with COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2020;15:2591–9. 33116476.

75. Ware JE Jr. SF-36 health survey update. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25:3130–9. 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00008. 11124729.

76. Kamenskaya O, Klinkova A, Loginova I, Chernyavskiy A, Edemskiy A, Lomivorotov VV, et al. Determinants of health-related quality of life 1 year after pulmonary thromboendarterectomy. Ann Vasc Surg 2018;51:254–61. 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.02.019. 29678648.

77. Kallonen J, Corbascio M, Rådegran G, Bredin F, Sartipy U. Quality of life and functional status after pulmonary endarterectomy for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: a Swedish single-center study. Pulm Circ 2023;13e12219. 10.1002/pul2.12219. 37128353.

78. Lins L, Carvalho FM. SF-36 total score as a single measure of health-related quality of life: scoping review. SAGE Open Med 2016;4:2050312116671725. 10.1177/2050312116671725. 27757230.

79. McKenna SP, Doughty N, Meads DM, Doward LC, Pepke-Zaba J. The Cambridge Pulmonary Hypertension Outcome Review (CAMPHOR): a measure of health-related quality of life and quality of life for patients with pulmonary hypertension. Qual Life Res 2006;15:103–15. 10.1007/s11136-005-3513-4. 16411035.

80. McCabe C, Bennett M, Doughty N, MacKenzie Ross R, Sharples L, Pepke-Zaba J. Patient-reported outcomes assessed by the CAMPHOR questionnaire predict clinical deterioration in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Chest 2013;144:522–30. 10.1378/chest.12-2443. 23430021.

81. Konrad F, Schreiber T, Brecht-Kraus D, Georgieff M. Mucociliary transport in ICU patients. Chest 1994;105:237–41. 10.1378/chest.105.1.237. 8275739.

82. Odor PM, Bampoe S, Gilhooly D, Creagh-Brown B, Moonesinghe SR. Perioperative interventions for prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2020;368:m540. 10.1136/bmj.m540. 32161042.

83. Rodriguez-Larrad A, Vellosillo-Ortega JM, Ruiz-Muneta C, Abecia-Inchaurregui LC, Seco J. Postoperative respiratory exercises reduce the risk of developing pulmonary complications in patients undergoing lobectomy. Arch Bronconeumol 2016;52:347–53. 10.1016/j.arbr.2016.02.015. 26860844.

84. Georgopoulos D, Bolaki M, Stamatopoulou V, Akoumianaki E. Respiratory drive: a journey from health to disease. J Intensive Care 2024;12:15. 10.1186/s40560-024-00731-5. 38650047.

85. Ntoumenopoulos G, Hammond N, Watts NR, Thompson K, Hanlon G, Paratz JD, et al. Secretion clearance strategies in Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Units. Aust Crit Care 2018;31:191–6. 10.1016/j.aucc.2017.06.002. 28662942.

86. Westerdahl E. Optimal technique for deep breathing exercises after cardiac surgery. Minerva Anestesiol 2015;81:678–83. 24937500.

87. Dagan Y, Wiser I, Weissman O, Farber N, Hundeshagen G, Winkler E, et al. An improvised “blow glove” device produces similar PEP values to a commercial PEP device: an experimental study. Physiother Can 2014;66:308–12. 10.3138/ptc.2013-31. 25125786.

88. Liverani B, Nava S, Polastri M. An integrative review on the positive expiratory pressure (PEP)-bottle therapy for patients with pulmonary diseases. Physiother Res Int 2020;25e1823. 10.1002/pri.1823. 31762162.

89. Borges MG, Borges DL, Ribeiro MO, Lima LS, Macedo KC, Nina VJ. Early mobilization prescription in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: systematic review. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg 2022;37:227–38. 10.21470/1678-9741-2021-0140. 35244377.

90. Inagaki T, Terada J, Tanabe N, Kawata N, Kasai H, Sugiura T, et al. Home-based pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with inoperable or residual chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: a preliminary study. Respir Investig 2014;52:357–64. 10.1016/j.resinv.2014.07.002. 25453379.

91. Nagel C, Prange F, Guth S, Herb J, Ehlken N, Fischer C, et al. Exercise training improves exercise capacity and quality of life in patients with inoperable or residual chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. PLoS One 2012;7e41603. 10.1371/journal.pone.0041603. 22848542.

92. Grünig E, Lichtblau M, Ehlken N, Ghofrani HA, Reichenberger F, Staehler G, et al. Safety and efficacy of exercise training in various forms of pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J 2012;40:84–92. 10.1183/09031936.00123711. 22323570.

93. UC San Diego Health. UC San Diego Health achieves milestones for lifesaving heart and lung treatments [Internet]. San Diego, CA: UC San Diego Health; 2025 [cited 2025 Mar 31]. https://health.ucsd.edu/news/press-releases/2024-09-26-uc-san-diego-health-achieves-milestones-for-lifesaving-heart-and-lung-treatments.

Article information Continued

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Database	Search string	Searched field
PubMed	("lung"[MeSH Terms] OR "lung"[All Fields] OR "pulmonary"[All Fields]) AND ("endarterectomy"[MeSH Terms] OR "endarterectomy"[All Fields] OR "endarterectomies"[All Fields]) AND ("rehabilitant"[All Fields] OR "rehabilitants"[All Fields] OR "rehabilitate"[All Fields] OR "rehabilitated"[All Fields] OR "rehabilitates"[All Fields] OR "rehabilitating"[All Fields] OR "rehabilitation"[MeSH Terms] OR "rehabilitation"[All Fields] OR "rehabilitations"[All Fields] OR "rehabilitative"[All Fields] OR "rehabilitation"[MeSH Subheading] OR "rehabilitation s"[All Fields] OR "rehabilitational"[All Fields] OR "rehabilitator"[All Fields] OR "rehabilitators"[All Fields])	All fields
Scopus	(TITLE-ABS-KEY (pulmonary AND endarterectomy) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY (rehabilitation))	Title, abstract, keyword
Web of Science	ALL=(pulmonary endarterectomy and rehabilitation)	All fields
CINAHL complete	TX pulmonary endarterectomy AND TX rehabilitation	All text
Cochrane Library	pulmonary endarterectomy AND rehabilitation	Title, abstract, keyword
LILACS	pulmonary endarterectomy AND rehabilitation	Title, abstract, subject
SciELO	pulmonary endarterectomy AND rehabilitation	All indexes

Study	Year	Country	Study design	Patients	Intervention/setting	No. of males (%)
Nagel et al. [57]	2020	Germany	Prospective interventional	45 patients aged 57.6±12.4 years	A 3-week inpatient rehabilitation program started at 3.3±0.9 weeks after PEA. Patients attended rehabilitation sessions 5 days/week for 1.5 hours, consisting of respiratory training, cycle ergometer, walking, and dumbbell exercises (0.5–1 kg). At discharge, patients were instructed to continue the training at home for 15 minutes/day, 5 days/week for 19 weeks	23 (51)
Seong et al. [58]	2019	Korea	Case report	A 34-year-old woman	V-A ECMO was initiated intraoperatively because of hemodynamic instability and hypoxemia during PEA. On POD 6, ECMO was changed to central (right atrium and ascending aorta), and cannulas were tunneled in the subxiphoid position. Active rehabilitation was performed twice/thrice a day until discharge on POD 43. The exercise protocol consisted of motor activities such as sitting on the edge of the bed and progressing to standing exercises	0 (0)
La Rovere et al. [59]	2019	Italy	Observational retrospective	110 patients: One cohort (Group 1) comprised 84 patients aged 60.4±13.8 years who met at least one of the following criteria postoperatively: mean PAP ≤25 mmHg, ≥50% reduction in mean PAP, ≥70% reduction in pulmonary vascular resistances	Patients in both groups participated in a postoperative rehabilitation program lasting 3 weeks, consisting of incremental exercise training aimed at reaching 50%–70% of the maximal load calculated based on the 6MWT performed at admission. Postoperative rehabilitation was initiated at 16.0±8.7 days in Group 1 and 16.7±11.5 days in Group 2	Group 1, 34 (40); Group 2, 11 (42)
La Rovere et al. [59]	2019	Italy	Observational retrospective	The remaining 26 patients (Group 2), aged 57.9±13.1 years, did not meet the previous criteria postoperatively		Group 1, 34 (40); Group 2, 11 (42)
Polastri et al. [60]	2013	Italy	Observational retrospective	26 patients aged 53 years (IQR, 19–77 years)	Postoperative acute rehabilitation commenced in the ICU and was prosecuted until hospital discharge. The rehabilitative program consisted of twice/daily sessions (6 days a week) of manual and device-assisted respiratory exercises and motor activities including PROM and AROM exercises, strengthening exercises, cycle ergometer and walking training. Postoperative rehabilitation was provided to patients during the sub-intensive care stay once discharged from the ICU, 4 days (IQR, 1–26 days) after the operation	15 (58)
Petrucci et al. [61]	2007	Italy	Observational retrospective	22 patients aged 53.4±15.3 years	Patients were initially provided with acute postoperative rehabilitation that lasted about 8 days (IQR, 4–13 days). In the acute phase, rehabilitation focused on clearing secretions and improving lung ventilation, including breathing control and the use of forced expiratory techniques. Postural transfers and walking training were also included. Then, outpatient post-acute rehabilitation consisted of cardiological and motor reeducation and was completed approximately 2 months after the operation	12 (55)

Study	Measurement	Functional exercise capacity/mobility	Dyspnea/exertion	Quality of life
Nagel et al. [57]	The 6MWD, exertion on exercise (Borg scale), and dyspnea intensity (Borg scale) were measured 3, 6, and 22 weeks after PEA. The SF-36 questionnaire was administered 3 and 22 weeks after PEA. Thirty-six out of 45 patients completed the follow-up at 22 weeks post-PEA	The 6MWD improved from 371.95±97.95 m pre-PEA to 428.29±111.74 m at 3 weeks post-PEA (p<0.0001). The 6MWD increased by 55±54 m and 65±64 m from 3 to 6 and 22 weeks post-PEA (p<0.0001)	Dyspnea at 3 weeks post-PEA was 14.00±2.50 points and decreased by 0.02±0.77 (p=0.847) and 0.18±2.43 (p=0.739) points at 6 and 22 weeks, respectively	The SF-36 PCS score improved by 19.55±19.42 points at 22 weeks (p=0.001) from baseline (42.78±18.37)
Nagel et al. [57]			The perceived exertion during the 6MWT at 3 weeks post-PEA was 15.61±1.35 points and decreased by 1.00±3.92 (p=0.089) and 0.76±2.46 (p=0.096) points at 6 and 22 weeks, respectively	The SF-36 MCS score improved by 6.36±20.44 points at 22 weeks (p=0.137) from baseline (55.76±23.94)
Seong et al. [58]	The patient’s ability to perform postural and motor tasks was assessed during the postoperative recovery period. The study did not identify specific outcome measures unless the patient could perform postural and motor tasks	On POD 7, the patient could sit at the edge of the bed while on ECMO and mechanical ventilatory support, stand without support and march in place. On POD 11, when extubated, the patient ambulated autonomously, and central ECMO was discontinued on POD 14
La Rovere et al. [59]	The 6MWT was performed preoperatively (T0), post-PEA before rehabilitation commenced (T1), once training was concluded (T2), and at 3 months (T3)	The 6MWD increased from T1 to T2 in both groups (p<0.0001). A further increase was observed from T2 to T3 in groups 1 (p=0.051) and 2 (p=0.009). Post-treatment, >85% of patients in both groups reached the MCID of the 6MWT (defined as 33 m)
Polastri et al. [60]	The daily walk distance patients could travel was measured during rehabilitation sessions	At baseline, patients could walk a median distance of 0 m (IQR, 0–100 m); on day 2, 5 m (IQR, 0–200 m); on day 3, 60 m (IQR, 0–720 m); at discharge 750 m (IQR, 60–2,300 m) (p<0.0001 discharge vs. baseline)
	The ability to climb at least one flight of stairs was also observed	At discharge, 20 patients (77%) could climb at least one flight of stairs
	During the postoperative stay in the sub-intensive care setting, measurements were taken on patient admission (baseline), day 1, day 2, day 3, and at discharge	At discharge, men could walk more than women: 850 m (IQR, 200–2,300 m) vs. 750 m (IQR, 60–900 m)
	The length of stay in the sub-intensive setting was 9.5 days (IQR, 3–20 days)	At discharge, patients ≥60 years could walk less than those <60 years: 450 m (IQR, 60–900 m) vs. 800 m (IQR, 350–2,300 m)
		At discharge, patients with a BMI ≥25 kg/m² could walk more than those with a BMI <25 kg/m²: 850 kg/m² (IQR, 155–2,000 kg/m²) vs. 750 kg/m² (60–2,300 kg/m²)
Petrucci et al. [61]	The 6MWT was performed preoperatively and at 3 months post-PEA. The Borg scale and the VAS were administered before and after the 6MWT	At 3 months, the 6MWD was 434.1 m vs. 284.7 m pre-PEA	Pre-PEA, the VAS pre-6MWT was 1.5 (IQR, 0–3.8), and post-6MWT 5.2 (IQR, 3.5–6)
			Post-PEA, the VAS pre-6MWT was 0 (IQR, 0–0), and post-6MWT 1.1 (IQR, 0.5–4)
			Pre-PEA, the Borg scale pre-6MWT was 1 (IQR, 0–2), and post-6MWT 4 (IQR, 3–5)
			Post-PEA, the Borg scale pre-6MWT was 0 (IQR, 0–0), and post-6MWT 1 (IQR, 1–3)