Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

JYMS : Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science

Indexed in: ESCI, Scopus, PubMed,
PubMed Central, Embase, CAS, KCI
FREE article processing charge
OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Articles

Page Path
HOME > J Yeungnam Med Sci > Volume 42; 2025 > Article
Review article
Psychiatry and Mental Health
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and mental health: a narrative review of emerging benefits and risks
JinWoo Kimorcid
Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science 2025;42:61.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12701/jyms.2025.42.61
Published online: September 29, 2025

Department of Psychiatry, Yeungnam University Hospital, Daegu, Korea

Corresponding author: JinWoo Kim, MD, PhD Department of Psychiatry, Yeungnam University Hospital, 170 Hyeonchung-ro, Nam-gu, Daegu 42415, Korea Tel: +82-53-620-3345 • Fax: +82-53-629-0256 • E-mail: 21756076@yu.ac.kr
• Received: August 31, 2025   • Revised: September 16, 2025   • Accepted: September 24, 2025

© 2025 Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Yeungnam University Institute of Medical Science

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 2,931 Views
  • 169 Download
  • Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), originally developed for type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity, are increasingly recognized for their significant impact on the central nervous system, leading to reports of both beneficial and adverse mental health effects. This review summarizes the current evidence on the effects of GLP-1 RAs on various psychiatric and neurocognitive conditions to evaluate their clinical benefits and potential risks. The literature has revealed a complex and multifaceted psychiatric profile. For depression and anxiety, the evidence is conflicting, with large observational studies showing contradictory results that are largely attributable to confounding by indication or methodological differences in the study design. In contrast, consistent and positive evidence suggests therapeutic potential for substance use disorders, particularly alcohol use disorders. Furthermore, emerging data indicate a significant neuroprotective role, with several cohort studies indicating a reduced risk of dementia. The major public and regulatory attention regarding suicidality appears to be driven by the methodological limitations of the initial reports, as well-controlled active comparator studies have not found an increased risk. However, the safety of GLP-1 RAs in high-risk psychiatric populations has not been established. In conclusion, while GLP-1 RAs show considerable therapeutic potential, their unresolved safety profile in patients with preexisting psychiatric conditions necessitates a cautious clinical approach. Future large-scale randomized controlled trials that include psychiatric populations are crucial for clarifying the direct neuromodulatory effects of these agents and establishing guidelines for their safe use.
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), which mimic the action of the incretin hormone GLP-1, are a class of medications developed for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity. The physiological functions of GLP-1 include stimulating insulin secretion from the pancreas, suppressing glucagon secretion, delaying gastric emptying, and acting on the brain to increase satiety. Through these multifaceted mechanisms, GLP-1 RAs have demonstrated robust efficacy in glycemic control and weight loss. The GLP-1 RAs approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and widely used include semaglutide, liraglutide, dulaglutide, and exenatide [1,2].
With the rapid increase in GLP-1 RA use, studies on effects other than weight management are emerging. Clinical studies have revealed that GLP-1 RAs provide significant benefits in extra-pancreatic areas, such as reducing cardiovascular disease risk, delaying the progression of diabetic kidney disease, and treating non-alcoholic fatty liver disease [3,4]. Furthermore, a growing body of evidence suggests that these drugs significantly affect the mental health of users. Many individuals have reported that various psychiatric symptoms, such as depression, anxiety, and addictive behaviors, either improve or worsen after using GLP-1 RAs [5]. Some studies have indicated that depression and anxiety scores are lower in patients with T2DM treated with GLP-1 RAs than in those treated with insulin [6]; however, concerns have been raised about serious psychiatric side effects, such as depression and suicidal ideation [7,8]. These conflicting results can cause confusion for both clinicians and patients. Therefore, this review aimed to comprehensively analyze the reported effects of GLP-1 RAs on mental health and evaluate their clinical benefits and safety.
GLP-1 receptors are widely distributed throughout the central nervous system, and GLP-1 is endogenously produced in areas such as the brainstem and hypothalamus. This provides a strong biological basis for the potential influence of GLP-1 RAs on mental functions. These receptors are primarily concentrated in two key circuits. First, they are found in homeostatic and reward centers, including the hypothalamus and ventral tegmental area, suggesting that they regulate not only simple appetite suppression, but also the motivational and hedonic aspects of food intake. Second, their distribution in cognitive and emotional circuits, such as the hippocampus and amygdala, supports their potential involvement in memory and mood regulation [1,9,10] (Fig. 1).
Furthermore, GLP-1 RAs exert direct neuroprotective and regulatory effects at the cellular level. The key mechanisms include anti-inflammatory effects that reduce neuroinflammation, antiapoptotic effects that promote neuronal survival, and stabilization of mitochondrial function and reduction in oxidative stress, which improve energy metabolism [11,12]. Additionally, their ability to promote neurogenesis and enhance synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus, the center of learning and memory, and modulate the effects of major neurotransmitters, such as dopamine and serotonin, provides a neurobiological foundation for their effects on mood, motivation, and cognition [4,10,12,13].
The effects of GLP-1 RAs on depression and anxiety disorders are among the most actively debated topics. Conflicting results from large-scale studies have caused considerable confusion in clinical practice.
1. Conflicting findings on the risk of depression and anxiety
Some studies suggest that GLP-1 RAs can improve the symptoms of depression and anxiety. One study indicated that patients with T2DM treated with GLP-1 analogs had lower depression and anxiety scores than those treated with insulin [6]. Supporting this observation, a large-scale database analysis by Epic Research indicated that patients prescribed GLP-1 RAs were significantly less likely to be diagnosed with depression and anxiety disorders than those in the non-user group. However, the scientific validity of Epic Research reports is limited, as they are not peer-reviewed, and their methodology is unclear. Therefore, these findings should be regarded as supportive rather than confirmatory evidence [14]. However, other studies have raised concerns that GLP-1 RAs may increase the risk of developing psychiatric disorders. A large-scale cohort study by Kornelius et al. [15] reported that in patients who were obese, treatment with GLP-1 RAs was associated with a significantly higher risk of developing major depressive disorder and anxiety disorders compared to the non-user group (Table 1).
2. Potential reasons for conflicting findings
The reason these large-database studies reached opposite conclusions is likely due to subtle differences in study design and various confounding factors that are difficult to control.

1) Confounding by indication

Obesity and depression are very closely linked biologically, and it is widely known that each increases the risk of the other by approximately 50% [16]. If this underlying risk is not statistically adjusted, a spurious association between drug use and the occurrence of psychiatric problems may appear. This confounding effect has been clearly demonstrated in a study by Shapiro et al. [17]. In the crude analysis of this study, the use of GLP-1 RAs appeared to have more than double the risk of suicidality compared to the use of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (hazard ratio [HR], 2.08). However, after adjusting for confounding variables, such as underlying diseases and psychiatric history, the risk decreased and the significant association disappeared (HR, 1.02) (Table 1).

2) Choice of comparator group

Another factor that significantly influences study outcomes is the choice of the comparator group. Studies using an inactive comparator (patients not using the drug) were much more susceptible to confounding variables than studies using an active comparator (patients taking other types of obesity/diabetes mellitus [DM] medications). Studies with conflicting results have differed decisively in this regard.

3) Direct versus indirect effects

Currently, a major point of contention is the difficulty in clearly distinguishing whether the observed mood changes are due to a direct change in brain circuits through GLP-1 receptor modulation or an indirect psychological and physiological result of weight loss and improved physical health [18].
3. Meta-analysis results
A meta-analysis by Chen et al. [19], which combined six randomized controlled trials (RCTs), supported a positive effect, finding that GLP-1 RAs significantly reduced depression scale scores compared with the control group (standardized mean difference, –0.12). However, a critical point of discussion is whether this antidepressant effect represents a direct neuromodulatory action or an indirect consequence of improved metabolic health (e.g., weight loss, glycemic control). According to Chen et al. [19], a significant limitation of the existing literature is that none of the included RCTs performed a formal mediation analysis to disentangle these two pathways. Therefore, the extent to which the observed mood improvements are a secondary benefit of better physical health versus a primary effect on central nervous system circuits remains unclear. This ambiguity, combined with the fact that the number of included studies was small and none were designed with depression as a primary outcome, highlights a critical gap in the current evidence and underscores the need for future research specifically designed to investigate these mechanisms [19-25] (Table 1).
In contrast to debates over depression and anxiety disorders, there is a relatively consistent accumulation of positive evidence regarding the effects of GLP-1 RAs on substance use disorders (SUDs).
1. Alcohol use disorder
Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is currently one of the most actively researched areas regarding the therapeutic potential of GLP-1 RAs. Multiple large-scale observational studies have consistently indicated that GLP-1 RA use is significantly associated with a reduced risk of AUD incidence or recurrence. Specifically, studies by Qeadan et al. [26] and Wang et al. [27] found significant reductions in alcohol intoxication and in new-onset and recurrence risks of AUD (Table 2). Notably, a “within-individual design” study by Lähteenvuo et al. [28], which compared periods when the same patient was taking the drug versus not taking it, showed that the risk of alcohol-related hospitalization was significantly reduced during the medication period, suggesting a potent therapeutic effect in clinical settings (Table 2). Although the results from RCTs are mixed and require further research [29-31], consistent reports of reduced alcohol-related risks across various study designs and populations are promising.
2. Nicotine use disorder (smoking)
The effects on smoking have been evaluated from two perspectives. While RCT results on the success of smoking cessation itself have been conflicting, the most important finding consistently observed across several studies is that GLP-1 RAs significantly suppress “post-cessation weight gain,” one of the major barriers to quitting. This is a unique advantage that no other smoking cessation treatment possesses, potentially making it a very effective treatment option for patients who hesitate to quit due to concerns about weight gain [32-35].
3. Other addictive substances
Research on other addictive substances is also actively underway (Table 2).

1) Opioids

Opioids are a class of drugs that act on opioid receptors in the brain and are primarily used for pain relief. This class includes prescription medications such as oxycodone and hydrocodone and illicit substances such as heroin and fentanyl. They have a high potential for addiction due to their ability to produce profound euphoria and analgesia. Although preclinical results are inconsistent [36], a large-scale analysis of patient records found that patients prescribed GLP-1 RAs had a significantly lower risk of future opioid overdoses [26].

2) Cannabis

Cannabis, derived from cannabis plants, is the most used psychoactive substance worldwide. Its primary psychoactive component, delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, causes euphoria and relaxation, and alters sensory perception. Although cannabis is often used recreationally and medicinally, its use can lead to the development of cannabis use disorder. A retrospective cohort study indicated that semaglutide use was associated with a reduced risk of cannabis use disorder incidence and recurrence compared with other obesity or DM treatments [37].

3) Cocaine

Cocaine is a potent central nervous system stimulant derived from the leaves of the coca plant. It primarily functions by blocking the reuptake of dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin, leading to intense euphoria, energy, and alertness. Owing to its powerful effects on the brain's reward pathway, it has a high potential to cause addiction. A small-scale RCT showed no significant changes in cocaine use or subjective effects, indicating the need for further research [38].
GLP-1 RAs appear to have a significant impact not only on mood and motivation, but also on cognitive function. Their potential in the prevention and treatment of neurodegenerative diseases has attracted considerable attention.
1. Dementia risk reduction
One of the most anticipated effects of GLP-1 RAs is their potential to prevent dementia. Several large-scale cohort studies have consistently indicated that GLP-1 RA treatment significantly lowers the risk of developing major dementias, including Alzheimer disease, Lewy body dementia, and vascular dementia [39-42]. Semaglutide, in particular, showed a more pronounced risk-reducing effect than other classes of GLP-1 RAs, suggesting that it may have additional neuroprotective effects beyond those common to the drug class [41] (Table 3). These results suggest the potential of GLP-1 RAs as disease-modifying treatments to slow or halt the progression of major neurocognitive disorders for which there are currently no definitive treatments [11,43].
2. Cognitive function enhancement
Research has also shown that GLP-1 RAs not only lower the risk of dementia but also enhance cognitive function. In a study of patients who were obese with pre-DM or early T2DM, liraglutide improved cognitive function scores, such as short-term memory [44], and brain imaging studies confirmed a significant increase in prefrontal cortex activity [45]. Notably, this improvement in cognitive function was not statistically correlated with changes in metabolic indicators such as weight or blood sugar levels. This strongly supports the possibility that cognitive enhancement from GLP-1 RAs is not an indirect effect of weight loss but a unique neurological effect acting directly on the brain [42,45]. However, the effect on overall cognitive function is not prominent in patients with established dementia, suggesting the benefit is most pronounced in patients with early-stage DM [46-48].
3. Parkinson disease treatment
The therapeutic potential of these compounds for Parkinson disease (PD) has been actively investigated. Some cohort studies have indicated that GLP-1 RAs are associated with a significantly lower incidence of PD than other oral antidiabetic drugs [39,49-51]. However, contrary to the improvements in motor symptoms observed in early clinical trials [52], a recently published large-scale phase 3 clinical trial showed no significant difference after 2 years of exenatide administration compared to placebo [53]. Because various studies have shown conflicting results, further research is required to determine the long-term effects on PD.
1. Impact on hedonic eating and binge behavior
GLP-1 RAs directly act on the brain's reward circuits that regulate not only homeostatic eating to replenish energy, but also hedonic eating driven by the pursuit of pleasure [36,54]. This mechanism raises the expectation that GLP-1 RAs could be new alternatives for treating binge eating disorder and bulimia nervosa. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses have indicated that GLP-1 RAs are promising agents to significantly reduce binge and emotional eating [55,56].
2. Potential for aggression modulation
In specific patient populations where dietary control is extremely difficult, such as those with autism spectrum disorder, GLP-1 RAs present new therapeutic possibilities. A case report described a patient with severe autism who, after treatment with liraglutide, showed a significant decrease not only in food-related obsessive thoughts and binging but also in aggression not directly related to food. Although this is a single case, it indicates that GLP-1 RAs may have a positive impact on the overall regulation of impulsivity and compulsive behaviors beyond controlling appetite [55,57].
3. Health management in patients with chronic mental illness
Antipsychotic drugs such as clozapine and olanzapine are known to cause significant weight gain and metabolic syndrome, which are major causes of morbidity and treatment non-adherence in patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder [58,59]. GLP-1 RAs may offer a new solution for these patients. Several RCTs in patients with schizophrenia who were obese and taking antipsychotics have shown that liraglutide or exenatide led to significant weight loss and improvements in metabolic indicators, such as fasting glucose and HbA1c levels, compared to placebo. Importantly, no significant worsening of psychiatric symptoms or other negative effects was observed during this process. This indicates that GLP-1 RAs could be an important tool to more effectively and safely manage the physical health of patients with chronic mental illness, thereby improving their quality of life [60-63].
A global investigation of the link between GLP-1 RAs and suicidal ideation began in 2023, with a few cases reported in Iceland, prompting a safety review by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). This event and subsequent analyses of European pharmacovigilance data have significantly raised awareness of the psychiatric safety of GLP-1 RAs [7,64].
1. Regulatory agency responses and limitations of initial evidence
After reviewing reported cases, the FDA and EMA provisionally concluded that the available data were insufficient to establish a clear causal relationship between the use of GLP-1 RAs and suicidal thoughts or actions [65]. This is because of the inherent limitations of pharmacovigilance data, which are based on spontaneous adverse event reporting. Such data are highly susceptible to influences, such as reporting bias, and cannot be used to infer causality.
2. Evidence from randomized controlled trials and real-world evidence

1) Randomized controlled trials

Multiple meta-analyses of RCTs involving tens of thousands of patients have consistently shown no statistically significant differences in the incidence of suicide-related events between GLP-1 RA and placebo groups [56,66] (Table 4). However, these findings have the critical limitation of exclusion bias. A significant number of major clinical trials intentionally excluded patients with a history of psychiatric illnesses at the design stage. This means that while the results demonstrate safety in a healthy population with low psychiatric risk, they do not directly prove safety in the vulnerable populations we are most concerned about [56,66].

2) Real-world evidence

Large-scale observational studies including patients with psychiatric histories provide crucial information to address this controversy. The most important finding from these studies is that the results differ dramatically depending on the choice of the comparator group. For instance, a study by Kornelius et al. [15] that used an inactive comparator (untreated patients who were obese) suggested an increased risk of suicidal behavior in the GLP-1 RA group. In contrast, studies employing an active comparator design, which better mitigates confounding by indication, consistently found no increased risk. After sophisticated statistical adjustments, large-scale cohort studies by Shapiro et al. [17], Hurtado et al. [67], and Ueda et al. [68] concluded that the risk of suicidality was not higher in the GLP-1 RA groups than in the groups using other types of DM or obesity medications. Furthermore, Wang et al. [69] observed a protective effect of semaglutide and reported a significantly reduced risk of new-onset suicidal ideation (Table 4).
3. Core of the controversy and its implications
In conclusion, the “suicidality controversy” can be interpreted not as a clear drug side effect but as an issue arising from the conflict between different types of evidence and the inherent limitations of each research method. Therefore, the central issue of the controversy shifts from whether GLP-1 RAs directly cause suicidality to the more nuanced question of whether the available safety data can be generalized to high-risk psychiatric populations, particularly since these groups were often excluded from pivotal clinical trials. This debate highlights a broader challenge in the new drug development process, namely the need for more robust psychiatric safety assessments, particularly for vulnerable populations.
GLP-1 RAs exert complex effects in the psychiatric domain. Although conflicting results exist for depression and anxiety, making it difficult to draw clear conclusions, relatively consistent and positive results have been reported for SUDs, including AUD, and the potential for dementia prevention. GLP-1 RAs can also play a crucial role in improving treatment adherence and quality of life in patients with certain chronic mental illnesses by effectively managing the metabolic issues caused by antipsychotics. Regarding the most significant controversy regarding the risk of suicidality, most well-controlled studies have not observed an increase, but safety in high-risk groups with a history of psychiatric conditions has not yet been clearly established.
The following tasks are crucial for advancing this field. First, sophisticated research designs are essential to clearly distinguish whether the observed psychiatric effects are due to the drug’s direct neuromodulatory action or the indirect psychological consequences of weight loss. Second, large-scale, long-term RCTs that, unlike previous studies, actively include patients with a history of psychiatric illness and set psychiatric outcomes as primary endpoints are urgently needed. Third, head-to-head studies that directly compare the effects of different GLP-1 RAs such as semaglutide and tirzepatide on psychiatric symptoms are required. Finally, discovering genetic and biological biomarkers that can predict which patients will experience positive or negative psychiatric effects will be the cornerstone of personalized medicine.
Although GLP-1 RAs are highly effective in treating T2DM and obesity, their safety in patients with a history of psychiatric disorders has not been sufficiently studied. Therefore, when prescribing in a clinical setting, it is necessary to assess the patient's psychiatric risk factors (e.g., comorbid psychiatric disorders, history of self-harm, or suicide attempts). If a patient is deemed high-risk, it is safer to prescribe the medication cautiously only after fully explaining the potential risks, such as depression or suicidal ideation, to the patient or caregiver and obtaining consent for continuous monitoring.

Conflicts of interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Funding

None.

Fig. 1.
Schematic of neural circuits modulated by glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists. The reward circuit, a neural pathway extending from the ventral tegmental area (VTA) to the nucleus accumbens (NA), modulates motivation and reward-seeking behavior. The VTA also projects to the prefrontal cortex (PFC), which works in conjunction with the amygdala (Am) and hippocampus (Hi) to perform functions related to memory and emotion. Hy, hypothalamus; NTS, nucleus tractus solitarius. Created with BioRender.com by the author.
jyms-2025-42-61f1.jpg
Table 1.
Comparison of cohort studies on the relationship between GLP-1 RAs and symptoms of depression and anxiety
Study Patient population Comparator group Depression risk Anxiety risk Key methodological features or limitations
Grant et al. [6] 138 DM patients Insulin users Significantly lower HADS score Significantly lower HADS score Early clinical study, small sample size
Epic Research [14] >3,000,000 DM, obesity patients Non-GLP-1 RAs users Significantly lower (e.g., tirzepatide OR, 0.35) Significantly lower (e.g., tirzepatide OR, 0.40) Lack of peer review, detailed methodology unclear
Kornelius et al. [15] >300,000 obesity patients Non-GLP-1 RAs users Significantly higher (HR, 2.95) Significantly higher (HR, 2.08) Inactive comparator design, highly susceptible to confounding by indication
Shapiro et al. [17] >250,000 T2DM patients Active comparator (DPP-4i, SGLT-2i) No significant difference (HR: DPP-4i, 1.02; SGLT-2i, 0.91) Not specified Active comparator design, controlled for confounding by indication
Chen et al. [19] >1,000 patients Variable Significantly lower depression rating scale score (SMD, –0.12) A small number of studies, lack of depression symptoms as the primary outcome

GLP-1 RAs, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists; DM, diabetes mellitus; HADS, hospital anxiety and depression scale; OR, odds ratio; HR, hazard ratio; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; DPP-4i, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor; SGLT-2i, sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor; SMD, standardized mean difference.

Table 2.
Summary of studies on glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for substance use disorder
Addictive substance Study Database/study characteristics Demonstrated effect
Alcohol Qeadan et al. [26] Large cohort of >810,000 AUD patients Significantly reduced alcohol intoxication incidence (aIRR, 0.50)
Wang et al. [27] Large database (>600,000), obesity/diabetes cohorts, Semaglutide study Significantly reduced new onset and recurrence risk of AUD (in obesity HR, 0.50/0.44; in T2DM HR, 0.56/0.61)
Lähteenvuo et al. [28] AUD patient cohort, within-individual design Significantly reduced risk of AUD-related hospitalization (semaglutide aHR, 0.64; liraglutide aHR, 0.72)
Nicotine Lee et al. [32] Systematic review Significantly suppressed post-cessation weight gain
Opioids Qeadan et al. [26] Analysis of >500,000 OUD patients records Significantly reduced risk of opioid overdose (aIRR, 0.60)
Cocaine Angarita et al. [38] Small-scale exenatide RCT No significant effect on cocaine uses or subjective effects
Cannabis Wang et al. [37] Cohort of obesity/T2DM patients, Semaglutide study Reduced incidence and recurrence risk of cannabis use disorder (in obesity HR, 0.56/0.62; in T2DM HR, 0.40/0.66)

AUD, alcohol use disorder; aIRR, adjusted incidence rate ratio; HR, hazard ratio; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; aHR; adjusted hazard ratio; OUD, opioid use disorder; RCT, randomized controlled trial.

Table 3.
Summary of clinical studies on the neurological effects of GLP-1 RAs
Disease/effect Study Database/study characteristics Demonstrated effect
Dementia risk reduction Siddeeque et al. [39] Cohort study of millions of obese patients Significantly reduced risk of AD, Lewy body dementia, and vascular dementia (RR, 0.63/0.59/0.44 in all GLP-1 RAs; RR, 0.40/0.41/0.18 in semaglutide)
Tang et al. [40] T2DM cohort study, Target Trial Emulation Significantly reduced risk of ADRD by 33% (HR, 0.67)
Wang et al. [41] Cohort study of >1.1 million diabetes patients Semaglutide significantly lowered the risk of first Alzheimer disease diagnosis compared to 7 other antidiabetic drug classes (HR, 0.33 vs. insulin; HR, 0.60 vs. SGLT-2i)
Tian et al. [42] Network meta-analysis GLP-1 RAs ranked 2nd for dementia prevention after SGLT-2i (SUCRA, 92.7%)
Cognitive function enhancement Vadini et al. [44] Liraglutide, obese patients with prediabetes/early T2DM Improved short-term memory and composite memory Z-score
Li et al. [45] Liraglutide Improved cognitive function scores and significantly increased prefrontal cortex activity
Gejl et al. [46], Watson et al. [47], Mullins et al. [48] RCTs in AD patients Improvements in specific domains (e.g., physiological changes, attention), but no significant improvement in overall cognitive function
PD treatment Brauer et al. [49], Rozani et al. [50], Tang et al. [51] Cohort studies GLP-1 RAs associated with significantly lower PD incidence compared to other oral antidiabetics
Siddeeque et al. [39] Cohort study Effect observed only with semaglutide; other GLP-1 RAs showed no significant difference (overall RR, 0.78; semaglutide RR, 0.57)
Aviles-Olmos et al. [52] Clinical trial Significantly improved motor symptoms in PD patients vs. placebo (MDS-UPDRS score, 5.6)
Vijiaratnam et al. [53] Exenatide phase 3 trial No significant difference vs. placebo after 2 years of treatment

GLP-1 RAs, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists; RR, relative ratio; AD, Alzheimer disease; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; ADRD, Alzheimer disease-related dementia; HR, hazard ratio; SGLT-2i, sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor; SUCRA, surface under the cumulative ranking curve; PD, Parkinson disease; MDS-UPDRS, the Movement Disorder Society-unified Parkinson disease rating scale; RCT, randomized controlled trial.

Table 4.
Methodological comparison of key evidence on GLP-1 RAs and suicidality risk
Evidence source Specific study/publication Comparator group Key methodological features Reported risk (HR/OR) Critical interpretation/key limitation
Pharmacovigilance data EMA [7]/FDA [65] announcements All other drugs in the database Spontaneous reporting system Disproportionality in reporting signals Cannot infer causality
Highly susceptible to reporting bias and confounding
RCT meta-analysis Ebrahimi et al. [66] Placebo Randomized assignment No significant difference (RR, 0.76) Exclusion bias
Low external validity (generalizability)
Pierret et al. [56] Placebo Randomized assignment No significant difference (log [RR], −0.02) Exclusion bias
Low external validity (generalizability)
RWE Kornelius et al. [15] Non-GLP-1 RA users (untreated obese patients) Inactive comparator Significantly higher risk of suicidal ideations or attempts (HR, 2.06) High risk of confounding by indication
Wang et al. [69] Users of other obesity/diabetes drugs Active comparator Significantly lower risk (in obesity: incidence HR, 0.27; recurrence HR, 0.44; in T2DM: HR, 0.36/0.51) Applying a different design to the same database with Kornelius et al. [15]
Shapiro et al. [17] DPP-4i, SGLT-2i users Active comparator No significant difference (HR, 1.02) Dramatic difference between pre- (HR, 2.08) and post-adjustment
Hurtado et al. [67] SGLT-2i users Active comparator No significant difference (HR, 1.04)
Ueda et al. [68] SGLT-2i users Active comparator No significant difference in suicidal death (HR, 1.25)
Including suicide death and non-fatal self-harm, the risk was significantly lower (HR, 0.83)

GLP-1 RAs, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists; HR, hazard ratio; OR, odds ratio; EMA, European Medicines Agency; FDA, U.S. Food and Drug Administration; RCT, randomized controlled trial; RR, relative ratio; RWE, real-world evidence; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; DPP-4i, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor; SGLT-2i, sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor.

  • 1. Müller TD, Finan B, Bloom SR, D’Alessio D, Drucker DJ, Flatt PR, et al. Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1). Mol Metab 2019;30:72–130.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 2. Wang JY, Wang QW, Yang XY, Yang W, Li DR, Jin JY, et al. GLP-1 receptor agonists for the treatment of obesity: role as a promising approach. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2023;14:1085799.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 3. Sheahan KH, Wahlberg EA, Gilbert MP. An overview of GLP-1 agonists and recent cardiovascular outcomes trials. Postgrad Med J 2020;96:156–61.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 4. Zhao X, Wang M, Wen Z, Lu Z, Cui L, Fu C, et al. GLP-1 receptor agonists: beyond their pancreatic effects. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2021;12:721135.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 5. Arillotta D, Floresta G, Guirguis A, Corkery JM, Catalani V, Martinotti G, et al. GLP-1 receptor agonists and related mental health issues: insights from a range of social media platforms using a mixed-methods approach. Brain Sci 2023;13:1503.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 6. Grant P, Lipscomb D, Quin J. Psychological and quality of life changes in patients using GLP-1 analogues. J Diabetes Complications 2011;25:244–6.ArticlePubMed
  • 7. European Medicines Agency (EMA). EMA statement on ongoing review of GLP-1 receptor agonists [Internet]. EMA; 2023 [cited 2025 Aug 31]. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/ema-statement-ongoing-review-glp-1-receptor-agonists.
  • 8. Li JR, Cao J, Wei J, Geng W. Case report: semaglutide-associated depression: a report of two cases. Front Psychiatry 2023;14:1238353.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 9. Farr OM, Sofopoulos M, Tsoukas MA, Dincer F, Thakkar B, Sahin-Efe A, et al. GLP-1 receptors exist in the parietal cortex, hypothalamus and medulla of human brains and the GLP-1 analogue liraglutide alters brain activity related to highly desirable food cues in individuals with diabetes: a crossover, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Diabetologia 2016;59:954–65.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 10. López-Ojeda W, Hurley RA. Glucagon-like peptide 1: an introduction and possible implications for neuropsychiatry. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 2024;36:A4–86.ArticlePubMed
  • 11. De Giorgi R, Ghenciulescu A, Yotter C, Taquet M, Koychev I. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for major neurocognitive disorders. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2025;96:870–83.ArticlePubMed
  • 12. Lv D, Feng P, Guan X, Liu Z, Li D, Xue C, et al. Neuroprotective effects of GLP-1 class drugs in Parkinson’s disease. Front Neurol 2024;15:1462240.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 13. Zhu C, Li H, Kong X, Wang Y, Sun T, Wang F. Possible mechanisms underlying the effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist on cocaine use disorder. Front Pharmacol 2022;13:819470.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 14. Miller A, Brensinger J, Bartelt K, Deckert J. Most GLP-1 medications correlated with a lower likelihood of anxiety and depression diagnoses [Internet]. Epic Research; 2024 [cited 2025 Aug 31]. https://epicresearch.org/articles/most-glp-1-medications-correlated-with-a-lower-likelihood-of-anxiety-and-depression-diagnoses.
  • 15. Kornelius E, Huang JY, Lo SC, Huang CN, Yang YS. The risk of depression, anxiety, and suicidal behavior in patients with obesity on glucagon like peptide-1 receptor agonist therapy. Sci Rep 2024;14:24433.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 16. Milano W, Ambrosio P, Carizzone F, De Biasio V, Di Munzio W, Foia MG, et al. Depression and obesity: analysis of common biomarkers. Diseases 2020;8:23.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 17. Shapiro SB, Yin H, Yu OHY, Rej S, Suissa S, Azoulay L. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and risk of suicidality among patients with type 2 diabetes: active comparator, new user cohort study. BMJ 2025;388:e080679. ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 18. Strumila R, Lengvenyte A, Guillaume S, Nobile B, Olie E, Courtet P. GLP-1 agonists and risk of suicidal thoughts and behaviours: confound by indication once again?: a narrative review. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2024;87:29–34.ArticlePubMed
  • 19. Chen X, Zhao P, Wang W, Guo L, Pan Q. The antidepressant effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2024;32:117–27.ArticlePubMed
  • 20. Athauda D, Maclagan K, Skene SS, Bajwa-Joseph M, Letchford D, Chowdhury K, et al. Exenatide once weekly versus placebo in Parkinson's disease: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2017;390:1664–75.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 21. Best JH, Rubin RR, Peyrot M, Li Y, Yan P, Malloy J, et al. Weight-related quality of life, health utility, psychological well-being, and satisfaction with exenatide once weekly compared with sitagliptin or pioglitazone after 26 weeks of treatment. Diabetes Care 2011;34:314–9.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 22. Bode BW, Testa MA, Magwire M, Hale PM, Hammer M, Blonde L, et al. Patient-reported outcomes following treatment with the human GLP-1 analogue liraglutide or glimepiride in monotherapy: results from a randomized controlled trial in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab 2010;12:604–12.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 23. de Wit HM, Vervoort GM, Jansen HJ, de Grauw WJ, de Galan BE, Tack CJ. Liraglutide reverses pronounced insulin-associated weight gain, improves glycaemic control and decreases insulin dose in patients with type 2 diabetes: a 26 week, randomised clinical trial (ELEGANT). Diabetologia 2014;57:1812–9.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 24. Miras AD, Pérez-Pevida B, Aldhwayan M, Kamocka A, McGlone ER, Al-Najim W, et al. Adjunctive liraglutide treatment in patients with persistent or recurrent type 2 diabetes after metabolic surgery (GRAVITAS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2019;7:549–59.ArticlePubMed
  • 25. Reaney M, Mathieu C, Ostenson CG, Matthaei S, Krarup T, Kiljański J, et al. Patient-reported outcomes among patients using exenatide twice daily or insulin in clinical practice in six European countries: the CHOICE prospective observational study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2013;11:217.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 26. Qeadan F, McCunn A, Tingey B. The association between glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and/or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist prescriptions and substance-related outcomes in patients with opioid and alcohol use disorders: a real-world data analysis. Addiction 2025;120:236–50.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 27. Wang W, Volkow ND, Berger NA, Davis PB, Kaelber DC, Xu R. Associations of semaglutide with incidence and recurrence of alcohol use disorder in real-world population. Nat Commun 2024;15:4548.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 28. Lähteenvuo M, Tiihonen J, Solismaa A, Tanskanen A, Mittendorfer-Rutz E, Taipale H. Repurposing semaglutide and liraglutide for alcohol use disorder. JAMA Psychiatry 2025;82:94–8.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 29. Martinelli S, Mazzotta A, Longaroni M, Petrucciani N. Potential role of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists in substance use disorder: a systematic review of randomized trials. Drug Alcohol Depend 2024;264:112424.ArticlePubMed
  • 30. Shen MR, Owusu-Boaitey K, Holsen LM, Suzuki J. The efficacy of GLP-1 agonists in treating substance use disorder in patients: a scoping review. J Addict Med 2024;18:488–98.ArticlePubMed
  • 31. Klausen MK, Jensen ME, Møller M, Le Dous N, Jensen AØ, Zeeman VA, et al. Exenatide once weekly for alcohol use disorder investigated in a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. JCI Insight 2022;7:e159863. ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 32. Lee S, Li M, Le GH, Teopiz KM, Vinberg M, Ho R, et al. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) as treatment for nicotine cessation in psychiatric populations: a systematic review. Ann Gen Psychiatry 2024;23:45.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 33. Yammine L, Green CE, Kosten TR, de Dios C, Suchting R, Lane SD, et al. Exenatide adjunct to nicotine patch facilitates smoking cessation and may reduce post-cessation weight gain: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Nicotine Tob Res 2021;23:1682–90.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 34. Lüthi H, Lengsfeld S, Burkard T, Meienberg A, Jeanloz N, Vukajlovic T, et al. Effect of dulaglutide in promoting abstinence during smoking cessation: 12-month follow-up of a single-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group trial. EClinicalMedicine 2024;68:102429.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 35. Lengsfeld S, Burkard T, Meienberg A, Jeanloz N, Coynel D, Vogt DR, et al. Glucagon-like peptide-1 analogues: a new way to quit smoking? (SKIP)-a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled study. Trials 2023;24:284.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 36. Eren-Yazicioglu CY, Yigit A, Dogruoz RE, Yapici-Eser H. Can GLP-1 Be a target for reward system related disorders?: a qualitative synthesis and systematic review analysis of studies on palatable food, drugs of abuse, and alcohol. Front Behav Neurosci 2020;14:614884.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 37. Wang W, Volkow ND, Berger NA, Davis PB, Kaelber DC, Xu R. Association of semaglutide with reduced incidence and relapse of cannabis use disorder in real-world populations: a retrospective cohort study. Mol Psychiatry 2024;29:2587–98.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 38. Angarita GA, Matuskey D, Pittman B, Costeines JL, Potenza MN, Jastreboff AM, et al. Testing the effects of the GLP-1 receptor agonist exenatide on cocaine self-administration and subjective responses in humans with cocaine use disorder. Drug Alcohol Depend 2021;221:108614.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 39. Siddeeque N, Hussein MH, Abdelmaksoud A, Bishop J, Attia AS, Elshazli RM, et al. Neuroprotective effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists in neurodegenerative Disorders: a Large-Scale Propensity-Matched cohort study. Int Immunopharmacol 2024;143:113537.ArticlePubMed
  • 40. Tang H, Donahoo WT, DeKosky ST, Lee YA, Kotecha P, Svensson M, et al. GLP-1RA and SGLT2i medications for type 2 diabetes and Alzheimer disease and related dementias. JAMA Neurol 2025;82:439–49.ArticlePubMed
  • 41. Wang W, Wang Q, Qi X, Gurney M, Perry G, Volkow ND, et al. Associations of semaglutide with first-time diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease in patients with type 2 diabetes: target trial emulation using nationwide real-world data in the US. Alzheimers Dement 2024;20:8661–72.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 42. Tian S, Jiang J, Wang J, Zhang Z, Miao Y, Ji X, et al. Comparison on cognitive outcomes of antidiabetic agents for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2023;39:e3673. ArticlePubMed
  • 43. Dou X, Zhao L, Li J, Jiang Y. Effect and mechanism of GLP-1 on cognitive function in diabetes mellitus. Front Neurosci 2025;19:1537898.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 44. Vadini F, Simeone PG, Boccatonda A, Guagnano MT, Liani R, Tripaldi R, et al. Liraglutide improves memory in obese patients with prediabetes or early type 2 diabetes: a randomized, controlled study. Int J Obes (Lond) 2020;44:1254–63.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 45. Li Q, Jia M, Yan Z, Li Q, Sun F, He C, et al. Activation of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor ameliorates cognitive decline in type 2 diabetes mellitus through a metabolism-independent pathway. J Am Heart Assoc 2021;10:e020734. ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 46. Gejl M, Gjedde A, Egefjord L, Møller A, Hansen SB, Vang K, et al. In Alzheimer’s disease, 6-month treatment with GLP-1 analog prevents decline of brain glucose metabolism: randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial. Front Aging Neurosci 2016;8:108.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 47. Watson KT, Wroolie TE, Tong G, Foland-Ross LC, Frangou S, Singh M, et al. Neural correlates of liraglutide effects in persons at risk for Alzheimer’s disease. Behav Brain Res 2019;356:271–8.ArticlePubMed
  • 48. Mullins RJ, Mustapic M, Chia CW, Carlson O, Gulyani S, Tran J, et al. A pilot study of exenatide actions in Alzheimer’s disease. Curr Alzheimer Res 2019;16:741–52.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 49. Brauer R, Wei L, Ma T, Athauda D, Girges C, Vijiaratnam N, et al. Diabetes medications and risk of Parkinson’s disease: a cohort study of patients with diabetes. Brain 2020;143:3067–76.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 50. Rozani V, Bezimianski MG, Azuri J, Bitan M, Peretz C. Anti-diabetic drug use and reduced risk of Parkinson’s disease: a community-based cohort study. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2024;128:107132.ArticlePubMed
  • 51. Tang H, Lu Y, Okun MS, Donahoo WT, Ramirez-Zamora A, Wang F, et al. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and risk of Parkinson’s disease in patients with type 2 diabetes: a population-based cohort study. Mov Disord 2024;39:1960–70.ArticlePubMed
  • 52. Aviles-Olmos I, Dickson J, Kefalopoulou Z, Djamshidian A, Kahan J, Ell P, et al. Motor and cognitive advantages persist 12 months after exenatide exposure in Parkinson’s disease. J Parkinsons Dis 2014;4:337–44.ArticlePubMed
  • 53. Vijiaratnam N, Girges C, Auld G, McComish R, King A, Skene SS, et al. Exenatide once a week versus placebo as a potential disease-modifying treatment for people with Parkinson’s disease in the UK: a phase 3, multicentre, double-blind, parallel-group, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2025;405:627–36.ArticlePubMed
  • 54. Skibicka KP. The central GLP-1: implications for food and drug reward. Front Neurosci 2013;7:181.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 55. Aoun L, Almardini S, Saliba F, Haddadin F, Mourad O, Jdaidani J, et al. GLP-1 receptor agonists: a novel pharmacotherapy for binge eating (Binge eating disorder and bulimia nervosa)?: a systematic review. J Clin Transl Endocrinol 2024;35:100333.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 56. Pierret AC, Mizuno Y, Saunders P, Lim E, De Giorgi R, Howes OD, et al. Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists and mental health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry 2025;82:643–53.ArticlePubMed
  • 57. Järvinen A, Laine MK, Tikkanen R, Castrén ML. Beneficial effects of GLP-1 agonist in a male with compulsive food-related behavior associated with autism. Front Psychiatry 2019;10:97.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 58. McIntyre RS, Konarski JZ. Obesity and psychiatric disorders: frequently encountered clinical questions. Focus 2005;3:511–9.Article
  • 59. Karoń K, Kozakowski J. Obesity and psychiatric disorders. Wiedza Medyczna 2023;5:1–7.
  • 60. Larsen JR, Vedtofte L, Jakobsen MS, Jespersen HR, Jakobsen MI, Svensson CK, et al. Effect of liraglutide treatment on prediabetes and overweight or obesity in clozapine- or olanzapine-treated patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorder: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry 2017;74:719–28.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 61. Lee K, Abraham S, Cleaver R. A systematic review of licensed weight-loss medications in treating antipsychotic-induced weight gain and obesity in schizophrenia and psychosis. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2022;78:58–67.ArticlePubMed
  • 62. McElroy SL, Guerdjikova AI, Blom TJ, Mori N, Romo-Nava F. Liraglutide in obese or overweight individuals with stable bipolar disorder. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2024;44:89–95.ArticlePubMed
  • 63. Breit S, Hubl D. The effect of GLP-1RAs on mental health and psychotropics-induced metabolic disorders: a systematic review. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2025;176:107415.ArticlePubMed
  • 64. Ruggiero R, Mascolo A, Spezzaferri A, Carpentieri C, Torella D, Sportiello L, et al. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and suicidal ideation: analysis of real-word data collected in the European pharmacovigilance database. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2024;17:147.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 65. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Update on FDA’s ongoing evaluation of reports of suicidal thoughts or actions in patients taking a certain type of medicines approved for type 2 diabetes and obesity [Internet]. Silver Spring, MD: FDA; 2024 Jan 11 [cited 2025 Aug 31]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/update-fdas-ongoing-evaluation-reports-suicidal-thoughts-or-actions-patients-taking-certain-type.
  • 66. Ebrahimi P, Batlle JC, Ayati A, Maqsood MH, Long C, Tarabanis C, et al. Suicide and self-harm events with GLP-1 receptor agonists in adults with diabetes or obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry 2025;82:888–95.ArticlePubMed
  • 67. Hurtado I, Robles C, Peiró S, García-Sempere A, Sanfélix-Gimeno G. Association of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists with suicidal ideation and self-injury in individuals with diabetes and obesity: a propensity-weighted, population-based cohort study. Diabetologia 2024;67:2471–80.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 68. Ueda P, Söderling J, Wintzell V, Svanström H, Pazzagli L, Eliasson B, et al. GLP-1 receptor agonist use and risk of suicide death. JAMA Intern Med 2024;184:1301–12.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 69. Wang W, Volkow ND, Berger NA, Davis PB, Kaelber DC, Xu R. Association of semaglutide with risk of suicidal ideation in a real-world cohort. Nat Med 2024;30:168–76.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  

      Figure
      • 0
      Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and mental health: a narrative review of emerging benefits and risks
      Image
      Fig. 1. Schematic of neural circuits modulated by glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists. The reward circuit, a neural pathway extending from the ventral tegmental area (VTA) to the nucleus accumbens (NA), modulates motivation and reward-seeking behavior. The VTA also projects to the prefrontal cortex (PFC), which works in conjunction with the amygdala (Am) and hippocampus (Hi) to perform functions related to memory and emotion. Hy, hypothalamus; NTS, nucleus tractus solitarius. Created with BioRender.com by the author.
      Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and mental health: a narrative review of emerging benefits and risks
      Study Patient population Comparator group Depression risk Anxiety risk Key methodological features or limitations
      Grant et al. [6] 138 DM patients Insulin users Significantly lower HADS score Significantly lower HADS score Early clinical study, small sample size
      Epic Research [14] >3,000,000 DM, obesity patients Non-GLP-1 RAs users Significantly lower (e.g., tirzepatide OR, 0.35) Significantly lower (e.g., tirzepatide OR, 0.40) Lack of peer review, detailed methodology unclear
      Kornelius et al. [15] >300,000 obesity patients Non-GLP-1 RAs users Significantly higher (HR, 2.95) Significantly higher (HR, 2.08) Inactive comparator design, highly susceptible to confounding by indication
      Shapiro et al. [17] >250,000 T2DM patients Active comparator (DPP-4i, SGLT-2i) No significant difference (HR: DPP-4i, 1.02; SGLT-2i, 0.91) Not specified Active comparator design, controlled for confounding by indication
      Chen et al. [19] >1,000 patients Variable Significantly lower depression rating scale score (SMD, –0.12) A small number of studies, lack of depression symptoms as the primary outcome
      Addictive substance Study Database/study characteristics Demonstrated effect
      Alcohol Qeadan et al. [26] Large cohort of >810,000 AUD patients Significantly reduced alcohol intoxication incidence (aIRR, 0.50)
      Wang et al. [27] Large database (>600,000), obesity/diabetes cohorts, Semaglutide study Significantly reduced new onset and recurrence risk of AUD (in obesity HR, 0.50/0.44; in T2DM HR, 0.56/0.61)
      Lähteenvuo et al. [28] AUD patient cohort, within-individual design Significantly reduced risk of AUD-related hospitalization (semaglutide aHR, 0.64; liraglutide aHR, 0.72)
      Nicotine Lee et al. [32] Systematic review Significantly suppressed post-cessation weight gain
      Opioids Qeadan et al. [26] Analysis of >500,000 OUD patients records Significantly reduced risk of opioid overdose (aIRR, 0.60)
      Cocaine Angarita et al. [38] Small-scale exenatide RCT No significant effect on cocaine uses or subjective effects
      Cannabis Wang et al. [37] Cohort of obesity/T2DM patients, Semaglutide study Reduced incidence and recurrence risk of cannabis use disorder (in obesity HR, 0.56/0.62; in T2DM HR, 0.40/0.66)
      Disease/effect Study Database/study characteristics Demonstrated effect
      Dementia risk reduction Siddeeque et al. [39] Cohort study of millions of obese patients Significantly reduced risk of AD, Lewy body dementia, and vascular dementia (RR, 0.63/0.59/0.44 in all GLP-1 RAs; RR, 0.40/0.41/0.18 in semaglutide)
      Tang et al. [40] T2DM cohort study, Target Trial Emulation Significantly reduced risk of ADRD by 33% (HR, 0.67)
      Wang et al. [41] Cohort study of >1.1 million diabetes patients Semaglutide significantly lowered the risk of first Alzheimer disease diagnosis compared to 7 other antidiabetic drug classes (HR, 0.33 vs. insulin; HR, 0.60 vs. SGLT-2i)
      Tian et al. [42] Network meta-analysis GLP-1 RAs ranked 2nd for dementia prevention after SGLT-2i (SUCRA, 92.7%)
      Cognitive function enhancement Vadini et al. [44] Liraglutide, obese patients with prediabetes/early T2DM Improved short-term memory and composite memory Z-score
      Li et al. [45] Liraglutide Improved cognitive function scores and significantly increased prefrontal cortex activity
      Gejl et al. [46], Watson et al. [47], Mullins et al. [48] RCTs in AD patients Improvements in specific domains (e.g., physiological changes, attention), but no significant improvement in overall cognitive function
      PD treatment Brauer et al. [49], Rozani et al. [50], Tang et al. [51] Cohort studies GLP-1 RAs associated with significantly lower PD incidence compared to other oral antidiabetics
      Siddeeque et al. [39] Cohort study Effect observed only with semaglutide; other GLP-1 RAs showed no significant difference (overall RR, 0.78; semaglutide RR, 0.57)
      Aviles-Olmos et al. [52] Clinical trial Significantly improved motor symptoms in PD patients vs. placebo (MDS-UPDRS score, 5.6)
      Vijiaratnam et al. [53] Exenatide phase 3 trial No significant difference vs. placebo after 2 years of treatment
      Evidence source Specific study/publication Comparator group Key methodological features Reported risk (HR/OR) Critical interpretation/key limitation
      Pharmacovigilance data EMA [7]/FDA [65] announcements All other drugs in the database Spontaneous reporting system Disproportionality in reporting signals Cannot infer causality
      Highly susceptible to reporting bias and confounding
      RCT meta-analysis Ebrahimi et al. [66] Placebo Randomized assignment No significant difference (RR, 0.76) Exclusion bias
      Low external validity (generalizability)
      Pierret et al. [56] Placebo Randomized assignment No significant difference (log [RR], −0.02) Exclusion bias
      Low external validity (generalizability)
      RWE Kornelius et al. [15] Non-GLP-1 RA users (untreated obese patients) Inactive comparator Significantly higher risk of suicidal ideations or attempts (HR, 2.06) High risk of confounding by indication
      Wang et al. [69] Users of other obesity/diabetes drugs Active comparator Significantly lower risk (in obesity: incidence HR, 0.27; recurrence HR, 0.44; in T2DM: HR, 0.36/0.51) Applying a different design to the same database with Kornelius et al. [15]
      Shapiro et al. [17] DPP-4i, SGLT-2i users Active comparator No significant difference (HR, 1.02) Dramatic difference between pre- (HR, 2.08) and post-adjustment
      Hurtado et al. [67] SGLT-2i users Active comparator No significant difference (HR, 1.04)
      Ueda et al. [68] SGLT-2i users Active comparator No significant difference in suicidal death (HR, 1.25)
      Including suicide death and non-fatal self-harm, the risk was significantly lower (HR, 0.83)
      Table 1. Comparison of cohort studies on the relationship between GLP-1 RAs and symptoms of depression and anxiety

      GLP-1 RAs, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists; DM, diabetes mellitus; HADS, hospital anxiety and depression scale; OR, odds ratio; HR, hazard ratio; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; DPP-4i, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor; SGLT-2i, sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor; SMD, standardized mean difference.

      Table 2. Summary of studies on glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for substance use disorder

      AUD, alcohol use disorder; aIRR, adjusted incidence rate ratio; HR, hazard ratio; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; aHR; adjusted hazard ratio; OUD, opioid use disorder; RCT, randomized controlled trial.

      Table 3. Summary of clinical studies on the neurological effects of GLP-1 RAs

      GLP-1 RAs, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists; RR, relative ratio; AD, Alzheimer disease; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; ADRD, Alzheimer disease-related dementia; HR, hazard ratio; SGLT-2i, sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor; SUCRA, surface under the cumulative ranking curve; PD, Parkinson disease; MDS-UPDRS, the Movement Disorder Society-unified Parkinson disease rating scale; RCT, randomized controlled trial.

      Table 4. Methodological comparison of key evidence on GLP-1 RAs and suicidality risk

      GLP-1 RAs, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists; HR, hazard ratio; OR, odds ratio; EMA, European Medicines Agency; FDA, U.S. Food and Drug Administration; RCT, randomized controlled trial; RR, relative ratio; RWE, real-world evidence; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; DPP-4i, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor; SGLT-2i, sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor.


      JYMS : Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science
      TOP