
Department of Psychiatry, Yeungnam University Hospital, Daegu, Korea
© 2025 Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Yeungnam University Institute of Medical Science
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Conflicts of interest
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Funding
None.
| Study | Patient population | Comparator group | Depression risk | Anxiety risk | Key methodological features or limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grant et al. [6] | 138 DM patients | Insulin users | Significantly lower HADS score | Significantly lower HADS score | Early clinical study, small sample size |
| Epic Research [14] | >3,000,000 DM, obesity patients | Non-GLP-1 RAs users | Significantly lower (e.g., tirzepatide OR, 0.35) | Significantly lower (e.g., tirzepatide OR, 0.40) | Lack of peer review, detailed methodology unclear |
| Kornelius et al. [15] | >300,000 obesity patients | Non-GLP-1 RAs users | Significantly higher (HR, 2.95) | Significantly higher (HR, 2.08) | Inactive comparator design, highly susceptible to confounding by indication |
| Shapiro et al. [17] | >250,000 T2DM patients | Active comparator (DPP-4i, SGLT-2i) | No significant difference (HR: DPP-4i, 1.02; SGLT-2i, 0.91) | Not specified | Active comparator design, controlled for confounding by indication |
| Chen et al. [19] | >1,000 patients | Variable | Significantly lower depression rating scale score (SMD, –0.12) | A small number of studies, lack of depression symptoms as the primary outcome |
GLP-1 RAs, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists; DM, diabetes mellitus; HADS, hospital anxiety and depression scale; OR, odds ratio; HR, hazard ratio; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; DPP-4i, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor; SGLT-2i, sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor; SMD, standardized mean difference.
| Addictive substance | Study | Database/study characteristics | Demonstrated effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alcohol | Qeadan et al. [26] | Large cohort of >810,000 AUD patients | Significantly reduced alcohol intoxication incidence (aIRR, 0.50) |
| Wang et al. [27] | Large database (>600,000), obesity/diabetes cohorts, Semaglutide study | Significantly reduced new onset and recurrence risk of AUD (in obesity HR, 0.50/0.44; in T2DM HR, 0.56/0.61) | |
| Lähteenvuo et al. [28] | AUD patient cohort, within-individual design | Significantly reduced risk of AUD-related hospitalization (semaglutide aHR, 0.64; liraglutide aHR, 0.72) | |
| Nicotine | Lee et al. [32] | Systematic review | Significantly suppressed post-cessation weight gain |
| Opioids | Qeadan et al. [26] | Analysis of >500,000 OUD patients records | Significantly reduced risk of opioid overdose (aIRR, 0.60) |
| Cocaine | Angarita et al. [38] | Small-scale exenatide RCT | No significant effect on cocaine uses or subjective effects |
| Cannabis | Wang et al. [37] | Cohort of obesity/T2DM patients, Semaglutide study | Reduced incidence and recurrence risk of cannabis use disorder (in obesity HR, 0.56/0.62; in T2DM HR, 0.40/0.66) |
| Disease/effect | Study | Database/study characteristics | Demonstrated effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dementia risk reduction | Siddeeque et al. [39] | Cohort study of millions of obese patients | Significantly reduced risk of AD, Lewy body dementia, and vascular dementia (RR, 0.63/0.59/0.44 in all GLP-1 RAs; RR, 0.40/0.41/0.18 in semaglutide) |
| Tang et al. [40] | T2DM cohort study, Target Trial Emulation | Significantly reduced risk of ADRD by 33% (HR, 0.67) | |
| Wang et al. [41] | Cohort study of >1.1 million diabetes patients | Semaglutide significantly lowered the risk of first Alzheimer disease diagnosis compared to 7 other antidiabetic drug classes (HR, 0.33 vs. insulin; HR, 0.60 vs. SGLT-2i) | |
| Tian et al. [42] | Network meta-analysis | GLP-1 RAs ranked 2nd for dementia prevention after SGLT-2i (SUCRA, 92.7%) | |
| Cognitive function enhancement | Vadini et al. [44] | Liraglutide, obese patients with prediabetes/early T2DM | Improved short-term memory and composite memory Z-score |
| Li et al. [45] | Liraglutide | Improved cognitive function scores and significantly increased prefrontal cortex activity | |
| Gejl et al. [46], Watson et al. [47], Mullins et al. [48] | RCTs in AD patients | Improvements in specific domains (e.g., physiological changes, attention), but no significant improvement in overall cognitive function | |
| PD treatment | Brauer et al. [49], Rozani et al. [50], Tang et al. [51] | Cohort studies | GLP-1 RAs associated with significantly lower PD incidence compared to other oral antidiabetics |
| Siddeeque et al. [39] | Cohort study | Effect observed only with semaglutide; other GLP-1 RAs showed no significant difference (overall RR, 0.78; semaglutide RR, 0.57) | |
| Aviles-Olmos et al. [52] | Clinical trial | Significantly improved motor symptoms in PD patients vs. placebo (MDS-UPDRS score, 5.6) | |
| Vijiaratnam et al. [53] | Exenatide phase 3 trial | No significant difference vs. placebo after 2 years of treatment |
GLP-1 RAs, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists; RR, relative ratio; AD, Alzheimer disease; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; ADRD, Alzheimer disease-related dementia; HR, hazard ratio; SGLT-2i, sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor; SUCRA, surface under the cumulative ranking curve; PD, Parkinson disease; MDS-UPDRS, the Movement Disorder Society-unified Parkinson disease rating scale; RCT, randomized controlled trial.
| Evidence source | Specific study/publication | Comparator group | Key methodological features | Reported risk (HR/OR) | Critical interpretation/key limitation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pharmacovigilance data | EMA [7]/FDA [65] announcements | All other drugs in the database | Spontaneous reporting system | Disproportionality in reporting signals | Cannot infer causality |
| Highly susceptible to reporting bias and confounding | |||||
| RCT meta-analysis | Ebrahimi et al. [66] | Placebo | Randomized assignment | No significant difference (RR, 0.76) | Exclusion bias |
| Low external validity (generalizability) | |||||
| Pierret et al. [56] | Placebo | Randomized assignment | No significant difference (log [RR], −0.02) | Exclusion bias | |
| Low external validity (generalizability) | |||||
| RWE | Kornelius et al. [15] | Non-GLP-1 RA users (untreated obese patients) | Inactive comparator | Significantly higher risk of suicidal ideations or attempts (HR, 2.06) | High risk of confounding by indication |
| Wang et al. [69] | Users of other obesity/diabetes drugs | Active comparator | Significantly lower risk (in obesity: incidence HR, 0.27; recurrence HR, 0.44; in T2DM: HR, 0.36/0.51) | Applying a different design to the same database with Kornelius et al. [15] | |
| Shapiro et al. [17] | DPP-4i, SGLT-2i users | Active comparator | No significant difference (HR, 1.02) | Dramatic difference between pre- (HR, 2.08) and post-adjustment | |
| Hurtado et al. [67] | SGLT-2i users | Active comparator | No significant difference (HR, 1.04) | ||
| Ueda et al. [68] | SGLT-2i users | Active comparator | No significant difference in suicidal death (HR, 1.25) | ||
| Including suicide death and non-fatal self-harm, the risk was significantly lower (HR, 0.83) |
GLP-1 RAs, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists; HR, hazard ratio; OR, odds ratio; EMA, European Medicines Agency; FDA, U.S. Food and Drug Administration; RCT, randomized controlled trial; RR, relative ratio; RWE, real-world evidence; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; DPP-4i, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor; SGLT-2i, sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor.
| Study | Patient population | Comparator group | Depression risk | Anxiety risk | Key methodological features or limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grant et al. [6] | 138 DM patients | Insulin users | Significantly lower HADS score | Significantly lower HADS score | Early clinical study, small sample size |
| Epic Research [14] | >3,000,000 DM, obesity patients | Non-GLP-1 RAs users | Significantly lower (e.g., tirzepatide OR, 0.35) | Significantly lower (e.g., tirzepatide OR, 0.40) | Lack of peer review, detailed methodology unclear |
| Kornelius et al. [15] | >300,000 obesity patients | Non-GLP-1 RAs users | Significantly higher (HR, 2.95) | Significantly higher (HR, 2.08) | Inactive comparator design, highly susceptible to confounding by indication |
| Shapiro et al. [17] | >250,000 T2DM patients | Active comparator (DPP-4i, SGLT-2i) | No significant difference (HR: DPP-4i, 1.02; SGLT-2i, 0.91) | Not specified | Active comparator design, controlled for confounding by indication |
| Chen et al. [19] | >1,000 patients | Variable | Significantly lower depression rating scale score (SMD, –0.12) | A small number of studies, lack of depression symptoms as the primary outcome |
| Addictive substance | Study | Database/study characteristics | Demonstrated effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alcohol | Qeadan et al. [26] | Large cohort of >810,000 AUD patients | Significantly reduced alcohol intoxication incidence (aIRR, 0.50) |
| Wang et al. [27] | Large database (>600,000), obesity/diabetes cohorts, Semaglutide study | Significantly reduced new onset and recurrence risk of AUD (in obesity HR, 0.50/0.44; in T2DM HR, 0.56/0.61) | |
| Lähteenvuo et al. [28] | AUD patient cohort, within-individual design | Significantly reduced risk of AUD-related hospitalization (semaglutide aHR, 0.64; liraglutide aHR, 0.72) | |
| Nicotine | Lee et al. [32] | Systematic review | Significantly suppressed post-cessation weight gain |
| Opioids | Qeadan et al. [26] | Analysis of >500,000 OUD patients records | Significantly reduced risk of opioid overdose (aIRR, 0.60) |
| Cocaine | Angarita et al. [38] | Small-scale exenatide RCT | No significant effect on cocaine uses or subjective effects |
| Cannabis | Wang et al. [37] | Cohort of obesity/T2DM patients, Semaglutide study | Reduced incidence and recurrence risk of cannabis use disorder (in obesity HR, 0.56/0.62; in T2DM HR, 0.40/0.66) |
| Disease/effect | Study | Database/study characteristics | Demonstrated effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dementia risk reduction | Siddeeque et al. [39] | Cohort study of millions of obese patients | Significantly reduced risk of AD, Lewy body dementia, and vascular dementia (RR, 0.63/0.59/0.44 in all GLP-1 RAs; RR, 0.40/0.41/0.18 in semaglutide) |
| Tang et al. [40] | T2DM cohort study, Target Trial Emulation | Significantly reduced risk of ADRD by 33% (HR, 0.67) | |
| Wang et al. [41] | Cohort study of >1.1 million diabetes patients | Semaglutide significantly lowered the risk of first Alzheimer disease diagnosis compared to 7 other antidiabetic drug classes (HR, 0.33 vs. insulin; HR, 0.60 vs. SGLT-2i) | |
| Tian et al. [42] | Network meta-analysis | GLP-1 RAs ranked 2nd for dementia prevention after SGLT-2i (SUCRA, 92.7%) | |
| Cognitive function enhancement | Vadini et al. [44] | Liraglutide, obese patients with prediabetes/early T2DM | Improved short-term memory and composite memory Z-score |
| Li et al. [45] | Liraglutide | Improved cognitive function scores and significantly increased prefrontal cortex activity | |
| Gejl et al. [46], Watson et al. [47], Mullins et al. [48] | RCTs in AD patients | Improvements in specific domains (e.g., physiological changes, attention), but no significant improvement in overall cognitive function | |
| PD treatment | Brauer et al. [49], Rozani et al. [50], Tang et al. [51] | Cohort studies | GLP-1 RAs associated with significantly lower PD incidence compared to other oral antidiabetics |
| Siddeeque et al. [39] | Cohort study | Effect observed only with semaglutide; other GLP-1 RAs showed no significant difference (overall RR, 0.78; semaglutide RR, 0.57) | |
| Aviles-Olmos et al. [52] | Clinical trial | Significantly improved motor symptoms in PD patients vs. placebo (MDS-UPDRS score, 5.6) | |
| Vijiaratnam et al. [53] | Exenatide phase 3 trial | No significant difference vs. placebo after 2 years of treatment |
| Evidence source | Specific study/publication | Comparator group | Key methodological features | Reported risk (HR/OR) | Critical interpretation/key limitation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pharmacovigilance data | EMA [7]/FDA [65] announcements | All other drugs in the database | Spontaneous reporting system | Disproportionality in reporting signals | Cannot infer causality |
| Highly susceptible to reporting bias and confounding | |||||
| RCT meta-analysis | Ebrahimi et al. [66] | Placebo | Randomized assignment | No significant difference (RR, 0.76) | Exclusion bias |
| Low external validity (generalizability) | |||||
| Pierret et al. [56] | Placebo | Randomized assignment | No significant difference (log [RR], −0.02) | Exclusion bias | |
| Low external validity (generalizability) | |||||
| RWE | Kornelius et al. [15] | Non-GLP-1 RA users (untreated obese patients) | Inactive comparator | Significantly higher risk of suicidal ideations or attempts (HR, 2.06) | High risk of confounding by indication |
| Wang et al. [69] | Users of other obesity/diabetes drugs | Active comparator | Significantly lower risk (in obesity: incidence HR, 0.27; recurrence HR, 0.44; in T2DM: HR, 0.36/0.51) | Applying a different design to the same database with Kornelius et al. [15] | |
| Shapiro et al. [17] | DPP-4i, SGLT-2i users | Active comparator | No significant difference (HR, 1.02) | Dramatic difference between pre- (HR, 2.08) and post-adjustment | |
| Hurtado et al. [67] | SGLT-2i users | Active comparator | No significant difference (HR, 1.04) | ||
| Ueda et al. [68] | SGLT-2i users | Active comparator | No significant difference in suicidal death (HR, 1.25) | ||
| Including suicide death and non-fatal self-harm, the risk was significantly lower (HR, 0.83) |
GLP-1 RAs, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists; DM, diabetes mellitus; HADS, hospital anxiety and depression scale; OR, odds ratio; HR, hazard ratio; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; DPP-4i, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor; SGLT-2i, sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor; SMD, standardized mean difference.
AUD, alcohol use disorder; aIRR, adjusted incidence rate ratio; HR, hazard ratio; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; aHR; adjusted hazard ratio; OUD, opioid use disorder; RCT, randomized controlled trial.
GLP-1 RAs, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists; RR, relative ratio; AD, Alzheimer disease; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; ADRD, Alzheimer disease-related dementia; HR, hazard ratio; SGLT-2i, sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor; SUCRA, surface under the cumulative ranking curve; PD, Parkinson disease; MDS-UPDRS, the Movement Disorder Society-unified Parkinson disease rating scale; RCT, randomized controlled trial.
GLP-1 RAs, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists; HR, hazard ratio; OR, odds ratio; EMA, European Medicines Agency; FDA, U.S. Food and Drug Administration; RCT, randomized controlled trial; RR, relative ratio; RWE, real-world evidence; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; DPP-4i, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor; SGLT-2i, sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor.