 |
|
Current aspects and prospects of glass ionomer cements for clinical dentistry
Eun Young Park, Sohee Kang
J Yeungnam Med Sci. 2020;37(3):169-178. Published online 2020 Jul 9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12701/yujm.2020.00374
|
|
Citations to this article as recorded by
 Marginal microleakage and modified microtensile bond strength of Activa Bioactive, in comparison with conventional restorative materials
Saba Tohidkhah, Hamid Kermanshah, Elham Ahmadi, Behnous Jalalian, Ladan Ranjbar Omrani
Clinical and Experimental Dental Research.2022;[Epub] CrossRef Conventional glass-ionomer cements: a guide for practitioners
Petros Mylonas, Jing Zhang, Avijit Banerjee
Dental Update.2021; 48(8): 643. CrossRef Difference in Bonding Strength of RMGIC according to Type of Hemostatic Agent in Primary Tooth
Seolah Back, Joonhaeng Lee, Jongbin Kim, Miran Han, Jong Soo Kim
THE JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ACADEMY OF PEDTATRIC DENTISTRY.2021; 48(4): 460. CrossRef Effect of Aluminum Chloride Hemostatic Agent on Bonding Strength of RMGIC in Primary Tooth
Seung-Hee Woo, Jisun Shin, Joonhaeng Lee, Miran Han, Jong Soo Kim
THE JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ACADEMY OF PEDTATRIC DENTISTRY.2021; 48(4): 397. CrossRef
|