Current aspects and prospects of glass ionomer cements for clinical dentistry
Eun Young Park, Sohee Kang
J Yeungnam Med Sci. 2020;37(3):169-178.   Published online 2020 Jul 9     DOI: https://doi.org/10.12701/yujm.2020.00374
Citations to this article as recorded by Crossref logo
Marginal microleakage and modified microtensile bond strength of Activa Bioactive, in comparison with conventional restorative materials
Saba Tohidkhah, Hamid Kermanshah, Elham Ahmadi, Behnous Jalalian, Ladan Ranjbar Omrani
Clinical and Experimental Dental Research.2022; 8(1): 329.     CrossRef
Usefulness of conventional glass ionomer cements in an environment of insufficient moisture exclusion
Yukihiro Naganuma, Masatoshi Takahashi, Yukyo Takada, Kumi Hoshi, Aki Kitaoka, Atsushi Takahashi, Keiichi Sasaki
Journal of Oral Science.2022; 64(3): 242.     CrossRef
Evaluation of a Method to Determine Wear Resistance of Class I Tooth Restorations during Cyclic Loading
Philipp Messer-Hannemann, Mariam Samadi, Henrik Böttcher, Sebastian Duy, Daniela Duy, Niclas Albrecht, Falk Schwendicke, Susanne Effenberger
Materials.2022; 15(15): 5440.     CrossRef
Conventional glass-ionomer cements: a guide for practitioners
Petros Mylonas, Jing Zhang, Avijit Banerjee
Dental Update.2021; 48(8): 643.     CrossRef
Difference in Bonding Strength of RMGIC according to Type of Hemostatic Agent in Primary Tooth
Seolah Back, Joonhaeng Lee, Jongbin Kim, Miran Han, Jong Soo Kim
THE JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ACADEMY OF PEDTATRIC DENTISTRY.2021; 48(4): 460.     CrossRef
Effect of Aluminum Chloride Hemostatic Agent on Bonding Strength of RMGIC in Primary Tooth
Seung-Hee Woo, Jisun Shin, Joonhaeng Lee, Miran Han, Jong Soo Kim
THE JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ACADEMY OF PEDTATRIC DENTISTRY.2021; 48(4): 397.     CrossRef