Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science

Original article

Dentistry
Classification of dental implant systems using cloud-based deep learning algorithm: an experimental study: Hyun Jun Kong; J Yeungnam Med Sci. 2023;40(Suppl):S29-S36. Published online July 26, 2023; DOI: https://doi.org/10.12701/jyms.2023.00465

8,792 View
205 Download
15 Web of Science
21 Crossref

Background
This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and clinical usability of implant system classification using automated machine learning on a Google Cloud platform.
Methods
Four dental implant systems were selected: Osstem TSIII, Osstem USII, Biomet 3i Os-seotite External, and Dentsply Sirona Xive. A total of 4,800 periapical radiographs (1,200 for each implant system) were collected and labeled based on electronic medical records. Regions of interest were manually cropped to 400×800 pixels, and all images were uploaded to Google Cloud storage. Approximately 80% of the images were used for training, 10% for validation, and 10% for testing. Google automated machine learning (AutoML) Vision automatically executed a neural architecture search technology to apply an appropriate algorithm to the uploaded data. A single-label image classification model was trained using AutoML. The performance of the mod-el was evaluated in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, specificity, and F1 score.
Results
The accuracy, precision, recall, specificity, and F1 score of the AutoML Vision model were 0.981, 0.963, 0.961, 0.985, and 0.962, respectively. Osstem TSIII had an accuracy of 100%. Osstem USII and 3i Osseotite External were most often confused in the confusion matrix.
Conclusion
Deep learning-based AutoML on a cloud platform showed high accuracy in the classification of dental implant systems as a fine-tuned convolutional neural network. Higher-quality images from various implant systems will be required to improve the performance and clinical usability of the model.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Advancements in artificial intelligence algorithms for dental implant identification: A systematic review with meta-analysis
Ahmed Yaseen Alqutaibi, Radhwan S. Algabri, Dina Elawady, Wafaa Ibrahim Ibrahim
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.2025; 134(4): 1089. CrossRef
Artificial intelligence for dental implant classification and peri-implant pathology identification in 2D radiographs: A systematic review
M Bonfanti-Gris, E Ruales, MP Salido, F Martinez-Rus, M Özcan, G Pradies
Journal of Dentistry.2025; 153: 105533. CrossRef
Artificial Intelligence in Detecting and Segmenting Vertical Misfit of Prosthesis in Radiographic Images of Dental Implants: A Cross‐Sectional Analysis
Paniz Fasih, Amir Yari, Lotfollah Kamali Hakim, Nader Nasim Kashe
Clinical Oral Implants Research.2025; 36(5): 578. CrossRef
Automated Machine Learning in Dentistry: A Narrative Review of Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions
Sohaib Shujaat
Diagnostics.2025; 15(3): 273. CrossRef
Advanced deep learning techniques for recognition of dental implants
Veena Benakatti, Ramesh P. Nayakar, Mallikarjun Anandhalli, Rohit sukhasare
Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research.2025; 15(2): 215. CrossRef
Optimized classification of dental implants using convolutional neural networks and pre-trained models with preprocessed data
Reza Ahmadi Lashaki, Zahra Raeisi, Nasim Razavi, Mehdi Goodarzi, Hossein Najafzadeh
BMC Oral Health.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Emerging technologies in the field of medicine presented at the Consumer Electronics Show 2025
Jong-Ryul Yang, Min Cheol Chang
Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science.2025; 42: 31. CrossRef
Assessment of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence Software in Identifying Common Periodontal and Restorative Dental Conditions (Marginal Bone Loss, Periapical Lesion, Crown, Restoration, Dental Caries) in Intraoral Periapical Radiographs
Wael I. Ibraheem, Saurabh Jain, Mohammed Naji Ayoub, Mohammed Ahmed Namazi, Amjad Ismail Alfaqih, Aparna Aggarwal, Abdullah A. Meshni, Ammar Almarghlani, Abdulkareem Abdullah Alhumaidan
Diagnostics.2025; 15(11): 1432. CrossRef
The role of artificial intelligence in implant dentistry: a systematic review
G. Vázquez-Sebrango, E. Anitua, I. Macía, I. Arganda-Carreras
International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.2025; 54(11): 1098. CrossRef
Efficacy of deep learning models and dental professionals in identifying dental implants
Veena Benakatti, Ramesh P. Nayakar, Mallikarjun Anandhalli, Rohit C. Sukhasare
Imaging Science in Dentistry.2025; 55(4): 351. CrossRef
Automated assessment of peri-implant disease severity by deep learning and image processing in periapical radiographs
Yi-Cheng Mao, Chiung-An Chen, Yuan-Jin Lin, Yu-Jen Chang, Sung-Tsun Wei, Shih-Lun Chen, Tsung-Yi Chen, Kuo-Chen Li, Wei-Chen Tu, Patricia Angela R. Abu
Journal of Dental Sciences.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Comparative analysis of YOLO variants for dental implant brand identification
Hatice Tekis, Taha Zirek, Melek Tassoker
Scientific Reports.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Advancing dental implant classification through YOLO-based deep learning models
Ashwini D. Khairkar, Sonali Kadam, Pankaj Kadam, Sujit Deshpande
International Journal of Information Technology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Development of a Deep Learning Classification Model Using a Codeless Platform for Orthodontic Extraction Decision-Making: Impact of Image Type on Model Performance
KyungMin Clara Lee
Journal of Dentistry.2025; : 106296. CrossRef
AI-assisted radiographic identification of original vs. replica dental implants: comparing accuracy of human experts vs. probabilistic and deterministic AI
Mark K. Bremer, Maximilian Blume, Samir Abou-Ayash, Muhammad Naseer Bajwa, Sheraz Ahmed, Jochen Hardt, Katja Petrowski, Monika Bjelopavlovic
International Journal of Implant Dentistry.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence Models in Dental Implant Fixture Identification and Classification from Radiographs: A Systematic Review
Wael I. Ibraheem
Diagnostics.2024; 14(8): 806. CrossRef
A Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning-Based Approaches for Classifying Dental Implants Decision Support System
Mohammed A. H. Lubbad, Ikbal Leblebicioglu Kurtulus, Dervis Karaboga, Kerem Kilic, Alper Basturk, Bahriye Akay, Ozkan Ufuk Nalbantoglu, Ozden Melis Durmaz Yilmaz, Mustafa Ayata, Serkan Yilmaz, Ishak Pacal
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine.2024; 37(5): 2559. CrossRef
Applications of Machine Learning in Periodontology and Implantology: A Comprehensive Review
Cristiana Adina Șalgău, Anca Morar, Andrei Daniel Zgarta, Diana-Larisa Ancuța, Alexandros Rădulescu, Ioan Liviu Mitrea, Andrei Ovidiu Tănase
Annals of Biomedical Engineering.2024; 52(9): 2348. CrossRef
Artificial neural networks development in prosthodontics - a systematic mapping review
Olivia Bobeică, Denis Iorga
Journal of Dentistry.2024; 151: 105385. CrossRef
Fracture strength of poly ether ether ketone abutment over short implant after fatigue
Mohamed A.E. Elsayed, Radwa A. El-dessouky, Mahmoud A.-A. Shakal
Tanta Dental Journal.2024; 21(3): 288. CrossRef
Race to the Moon or the Bottom? Applications, Performance, and Ethical Considerations of Artificial Intelligence in Prosthodontics and Implant Dentistry
Amal Alfaraj, Toshiki Nagai, Hawra AlQallaf, Wei-Shao Lin
Dentistry Journal.2024; 13(1): 13. CrossRef

Review article

Medical Education
Trends in the study on medical education over the last 10 years, based on paper titles: Seong Yong Kim; Yeungnam Univ J Med. 2019;36(2):78-84. Published online May 13, 2019; DOI: https://doi.org/10.12701/yujm.2019.00206

7,150 View
119 Download
2 Crossref

Abstract PDF

Medical education research subjects are incredibly diverse and have changed over time. This work in particular aims to compare and analyze research trends in medical education through the words used in the titles of these research papers. Academic Medicine (the journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges), Medical Teacher (the journal of the Association of Medical Education in Europe), the Korean Journal of Medical Education (KJME), and Korean Medical Education Review (KMER) were selected and analyzed for the purposes of this research. From 2009 to 2018, Academic Medicine and Medical Teacher published approximately 10 to 20 times more papers than the KJME and KMER. Frequently used words in these titles include “medical,” “student,” “education,” and “learning.” The words “clinical” and “learning” were used relatively often (7.80% to 13.66%) in Korean Journals and Medical Teacher, but Academic Medicine used these phrases relatively less often (6.47% and 4.41%, respectively). Concern with such various topics as problem-based learning, team-based learning, program evaluations, burnout, e-learning, and digital indicates that Medical Teacher seems to primarily deal with teaching and learning methodologies, and Academic Medicine handles all aspects of medical education. The KJME and KMER did not cover all subjects, as they publish smaller papers. However, it is anticipated that research on new subjects, such as artificial intelligence in medical education, will occur in the near future.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

A Study on the Application of Flipped Classroom Combined with Case Teaching in Urology Clinical Nursing Teaching
玉珠黄
Nursing Science.2024; 13(07): 898. CrossRef
Assessing the effectiveness of massive open online courses on improving clinical skills in medical education in China: A meta-analysis
Ling Yang, Jiao Zou, Junwei Gao, Xiaotang Fan
Heliyon.2023; 9(8): e19263. CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search